Guidelines for the management of patients with severe acute pancreatitis, 2021

分级(工程) 指南 医学 证据质量 梅德林 循证医学 质量管理 替代医学 随机对照试验 运营管理 外科 工程类 管理制度 病理 土木工程 经济 法学 政治学
作者
Samir Jaber,Marc Garnier,Karim Asehnoune,Fanny Vardon‐Bounes,Louis Buscail,Jean‐Baptiste Chevaux,Claire Dahyot‐Fizelier,Lucie Darrivère,Matthieu Jabaudon,Olivier Joannès-Boyau,Yoann Launey,Éric Levesque,Philippe Lévy,Philippe Montravers,Laurent Müller,Thomas Rimmelé,Claire Roger,Céline Savoye-Collet,Philippe Séguin,Jean‐Pierre Tasu,Ronan Thibault,Geoffroy Vanbiervliet,Emmanuel Weiss,Audrey De Jong
出处
期刊:Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:41 (3): 101060-101060 被引量:85
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101060
摘要

To provide guidelines for the management of the intensive care patient with severe acute pancreatitis.A consensus committee of 22 experts was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the beginning of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guideline construction process was conducted independently of any industrial funding (i.e. pharmaceutical, medical devices). The authors were required to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasised.The most recent SFAR and SNFGE guidelines on the management of the patient with severe pancreatitis were published in 2001. The literature now is sufficient for an update. The committee studied 14 questions within 3 fields. Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients Intervention Comparison Outcome) format and the relevant evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology.The experts' synthesis work and their application of the GRADE® method resulted in 24 recommendations. Among the formalised recommendations, 8 have high levels of evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 12 have moderate levels of evidence (GRADE 2+/-). For 4 recommendations, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in expert opinions. Four questions did not find any response in the literature. After one round of scoring, strong agreement was reached for all the recommendations.There was strong agreement among experts for 24 recommendations to improve practices for the management of intensive care patients with severe acute pancreatitis.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
sssssssssss完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
特安谭完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Airhug完成签到 ,获得积分0
1秒前
zhoushaoyun2000完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
做梦的鱼完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
CZF完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
史克珍香完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
谷粱诗云完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
李桢完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
清新的夜梦完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
炙热的宛完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
呆喂完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
柯子轩发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Lauren完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
吐泡泡的奇异果完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
猩猩完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Cheshire完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Shicheng完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
huangqinxue完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
施含莲发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
勤奋的凌翠完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
不想长大完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
鸠摩智完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
sr完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
snow完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
小趴蔡完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
从容藏花完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
dy完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
卖萌的秋田完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
无私的朝雪完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
有有完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences, Global Edition, 6th edition 600
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
Walter Gilbert: Selected Works 500
An Annotated Checklist of Dinosaur Species by Continent 500
岡本唐貴自伝的回想画集 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3661181
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3222298
关于积分的说明 9744486
捐赠科研通 2931912
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1605300
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 757805
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 734569