Comparison of the accuracy of the 7-item HADS Depression subscale and 14-item total HADS for screening for major depression: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

医院焦虑抑郁量表 荟萃分析 接收机工作特性 心理学 萧条(经济学) 焦虑 统计 精神科 内科学 医学 数学 经济 宏观经济学
作者
Wu Yin,Brooke Levis,Federico M. Daray,John P. A. Ioannidis,Scott B. Patten,Pim Cuijpers,Roy C. Ziegelstein,Simon Gilbody,Felix Fischer,Suiqiong Fan,Ying Sun,Chen He,Ankur Krishnan,Dipika Neupane,Parash Mani Bhandari,Zelalem Negeri,Kira E. Riehm,Danielle B. Rice,Marleine Azar,Xin Wei Yan,Mahrukh Imran,Matthew J. Chiovitti,Jill Boruff,Dean McMillan,Lorie A. Kloda,Sarah Markham,Mélissa Henry,Zahinoor Ismail,Carmen G. Loiselle,Nicholas Mitchell,Samir Al‐Adawi,Kevin Roy Beck,Anna Beraldi,Çharles N. Bernstein,Birgitte Boye,Natalie Büel-Drabe,Adomas Bunevičius,Ceyhun Can,Gregory Carter,Chih‐Ken Chen,Gary Cheung,Kerrie Clover,Ronán Conroy,Gema Costa‐Requena,Daniel Cukor,Eli Dabscheck,Jennifer De Souza,Marina G. Downing,Anthony Feinstein,Panagiotis Ferentinos,Alastair J. Flint,Pamela Gallagher,Milena Gandy,Luigi Grassi,Martin Härter,Asunción Hernando,Melinda L. Jackson,Josef Jenewein,Nathalie Jetté,Miguel Julião,Marie Kjærgaard,Sebastian Köhler,Hans‐Helmut König,Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna,Yu Lee,Margrit Löbner,Wim L Loosman,Anthony W. Love,Bernd Löwe,Ulrik Fredrik Malt,Ruth Ann Marrie,Loreto Massardo,Yutaka Matsuoka,Anja Mehnert,Ioannis Michopoulos,L. Misery,Christian J. Nelson,Ng Chong Guan,Meaghan O’Donnell,Suzanne O’Rourke,Ahmet Öztürk,Alexander Pabst,Julie A. Pasco,Jūratė Pečeliūnienė,Luís Pintor,Jennie Ponsford,Federico Pulido,Terence J. Quinn,Silje Endresen Rème,Katrin Reuter,Steffi G. Riedel‐Heller,Alasdair G Rooney,Roberto Sánchez,Rebecca M. Saracino,Melanie P. J. Schellekens,Martin Scherer,Andrea Benedetti,Brett D. Thombs,et al
出处
期刊:Psychological Assessment [American Psychological Association]
卷期号:35 (2): 95-114 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1037/pas0001181
摘要

Comparison of the accuracy of the 7-item HADS Depression subscale and 14-item total HADS for screening for major depression: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis AbstractThe 7-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) and the total score of the 14-item HADS (HADS-T) are both used for major depression screening.Compared to the HADS-D, the HADS-T includes anxiety items and requires more time to complete.We compared the screening accuracy of the HADS-D and HADS-T for major depression detection.We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis and fit bivariate random-effects models to assess diagnostic accuracy among participants with both HADS-D and HADS-T scores.We identified optimal cutoffs, estimated sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and compared screening accuracy across paired cutoffs via two-stage and individual-level models.We used a 0.05 equivalence margin to assess equivalency in sensitivity and specificity.20,700 participants (2,285 major depression cases) from 98 studies were included.Cutoffs of ≥ 7 for the HADS-D (sensitivity 0.79 [0.75, 0.83], specificity 0.78 [0.75, 0.80]) and ≥ 15 for the HADS-T (sensitivity 0.79 [0.76, 0.82], specificity 0.81 [0.78, 0.83]) minimized the distance to the top-left corner of the receiver operating characteristic curve.Across all sets of paired cutoffs evaluated, differences of sensitivity between HADS-T and HADS-D ranged from -0.05 to 0.01 (0.00 at paired optimal cutoffs), and differences of specificity were within 0.03 for all cutoffs (0.02 to 0.03).The pattern was similar among outpatients, although the HADS-T was slightly (not non-equivalently) more specific among inpatients.The accuracy of HADS-T was equivalent to the HADS-D for detecting major depression.In most settings, the shorter HADS-D would be preferred.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
yinyi发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
赵一丁完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
成就绮琴完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
Chen完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
huanfid完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
Stitch完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
眯眯眼的冷珍完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
bjyx完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
reck完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
pharmstudent发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
小田完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
小喵发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
FashionBoy应助毛毛哦啊采纳,获得10
4秒前
Lucas应助Chen采纳,获得10
5秒前
强健的蚂蚁完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
小宇发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
斜杠武完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
6秒前
伞兵龙发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
RC_Wang应助科研小民工采纳,获得10
6秒前
sanben完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
_蝴蝶小姐完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
诗轩发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
迟大猫应助乐乱采纳,获得10
9秒前
万能图书馆应助派大星采纳,获得10
10秒前
FashionBoy应助娜行采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
传奇3应助后知后觉采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Social media impact on athlete mental health: #RealityCheck 1020
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527304
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3107454
关于积分的说明 9285518
捐赠科研通 2805269
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1539827
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716708
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709672