辍学(神经网络)
背景(考古学)
高等教育
政治学
动作(物理)
心理学
社会学
地理
计算机科学
物理
考古
量子力学
机器学习
法学
作者
Melisa Diaz Lema,Melvin Vooren,Marta Cannistrà,Chris van Klaveren,Tommaso Agasisti,Ilja Cornelisz
标识
DOI:10.1080/03075079.2023.2224818
摘要
ABSTRACTABSTRACTStudy success in Higher Education is of primary importance in the European policy agenda. Yet, given the diverse educational landscape across countries and institutions, more coordinated action is needed to gain a more solid knowledge of the dropout phenomenon. This study aims to gain a better insight into students' dropout based on an integrated comparative study of two universities located in two different European countries: Politecnico di Milano (Italy) and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (the Netherlands). This research aims at assessing whether the factors affecting dropout are similar in the Italian and the Dutch contexts by testing the predictive capacity of ad-hoc models trained in other university-country settings at three different stages of the student's university journey: (i) enrolment, (ii) end of the first semester, and (iii) end of the first year. Results show that the predictive capacity of models is exchangeable across different contexts, and it improves dramatically once data on university performance becomes available. We find that the models trained in the Dutch context have a better ability to identify dropouts in the Italian context than the other way around. Models trained on Dutch data allow us to better understand the relationship between educational credits obtained, the most important variable across models, and students' dropout. This study contributes to creating a European common arena for discussing Higher Education success issues.KEYWORDS: Student dropoutHigher Educationpredictive modelingcross-country comparisonmodel exchangeability AcknowledgementsWe thank the 'Data Analytics for Institutional Support' of PoliMi and 'Student en Onderwijszaken' of the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam for facilitating access to the University register data, and for overall support throughout the research process. These institutional units leverage the available (administrative) datasets of each university to support internal decision-making. All the eventual errors are our sole responsibility.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Correction StatementThis article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI