Assessing the outcomes of parasacral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PTENS) in the treatment of enuresis in children: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized control trials

医学 随机对照试验 遗尿 荟萃分析 科克伦图书馆 梅德林 经皮神经电刺激 儿科 物理疗法 外科 内科学 替代医学 政治学 病理 法学
作者
James P. Toale,Gabrielle E. Kelly,Piotr Hajduk,Salvatore Cascio
出处
期刊:Neurourology and Urodynamics [Wiley]
卷期号:41 (8): 1659-1669
标识
DOI:10.1002/nau.25039
摘要

Introduction Nocturnal enuresis (NE) is a common pathology in children that can have significant behavioral, emotional, and social impacts on a child's life. Recent studies have assessed PTENS as a potential treatment method for NE, particularly in those who do not respond to initial first-line treatments. Literature has shown varying results with regard to its success. There has been no systematic review and meta-analysis to date assessing outcomes following this treatment. Objectives Despite multiple studies showing the potential benefits of PTENS in NE, there has been no consensus regarding its efficacy. The aim of this study was to systematically analyze the effects of PTENS on children with NE. Study Design In September 2021, a search of PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was carried out for studies relating to outcomes following PTENS in children with NE. Studies included were original publication English language randomized controlled trial (RCT's) with at least ten children receiving parasacral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PTENS). After assessing for relevant studies, data were collated and analyzed from the included studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane seven domain assessment. Our primary outcome was response and nonresponse to treatment. These results were combined in a fixed effects meta-analysis model to obtain an overall estimate of the success rate. Information regarding demographics was also collected. There was no external funding for this review. Results Of 145 studies found initially, four RCT's (208 children) were included. The weighted mean rate of full response to active PTENS was 10.8% (0%−19%). All studies considered, meta-analysis showed no difference between PTENS and controls (RR: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI: 0.37−1.32]). Subgroup analysis of monosymptomatic enuresis showed no effect of PTENS compared to controls (RR = 0.58, 95% CI: [0.24−1.42]). When grouped, studies comparing PTENS to sham/behavioral treatment showed no benefit compared to controls (RR = 0.81, 95% CI: [0.05−12.53]) and those comparing PTENS to biofeedback/interferential current (IFC) showed no difference to controls (RR = 0.69, 95% CI: [0.36−1.33]). There was no evidence of a difference between cases and controls between these latter subgroups (RR = 0.70, 95% CI: [0.37−1.32]). Discussion/Conclusion Our results suggest that PTENS has no clear benefit in the management of children with NE compared to controls. Subgroup analysis showed that its use in monosymptomatic NE has no clear advantage. However, this review has highlighted the need for further high quality studies. Limitations to this review included a relatively small sample size and the use of prior or concomitant therapies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
浮云完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
屈岂愈完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
17秒前
Pupil完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
偏偏意气用事完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
安安完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
cttc完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
Chnimike完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
27秒前
红茸茸羊完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
年轻千愁完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
liu完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
Wanyeweiyu完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
Fury完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
风中幻梦完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
bigpluto完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
42秒前
是谁还没睡完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
盘尼西林发布了新的文献求助10
47秒前
zzz完成签到 ,获得积分10
49秒前
dktrrrr完成签到,获得积分10
51秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
51秒前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
51秒前
51秒前
ccc完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
萧秋灵完成签到,获得积分10
57秒前
缓慢冥幽完成签到,获得积分10
57秒前
旺仔同学完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
吉以寒完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
科研老兵完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
fys131415完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
执着的忆雪完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
闵不悔完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
阳光火车完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
cc完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
合适的寄灵完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038066
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3575779
关于积分的说明 11373801
捐赠科研通 3305584
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819239
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892655
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815022