拉考沙胺
发作性
癫痫
四分位间距
医学
麻醉
儿科
内科学
精神科
作者
Hiromitsu Hoshino,Yu Miyasato,Takayuki Handa,Yutaro Tomi,Hideaki Kanemura
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2023.06.022
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of lacosamide (LCM) on interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) and evaluate the relationships between IEDs and seizure outcome in pediatric patients with focal epilepsy. Methods Patient inclusion criteria included: 1) newly diagnosed focal epilepsy with unknown etiology, and 2) electroencephalogram recorded twice (before and after starting LCM) under the same conditions. The difference between the highest number of IEDs over 5 successive minutes (IEDs/5 min) and the location of IEDs was determined. Seizure outcome was evaluated 1 year after achieving the maintenance dose of LCM. Responders were identified as showing a ≥50% reduction in the pre-LCM seizure frequency. Results Of 22 patients, 10 showed an increase in IEDs/5 min after starting LCM. The median IEDs/5 min before and after starting LCM was not significantly different, at 1.5 (interquartile range: 0, 31.75) and 10.5 (0, 80.5), respectively. No relationship was identified between the difference in IEDs/5 min and seizure outcome. Patients with multiple regional or diffuse IEDs had significantly poorer seizure outcome compared with patients without those IEDs (p = 0.036 and p = 0.039, respectively). Of 10 patients with single regional IEDs, a tendency to disappear IEDs was observed between patients with frontal and non-frontal IEDs. Conclusion The effects of LCM on the number of IEDs may be unrelated to seizure outcome. LCM may be ineffective at improving seizure outcomes in patients with multiple regional or diffuse IEDs.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI