Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value Is Independently Correlated to Impaired Coronary Flow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Immune-inflammatory biomarkers have been shown to be correlated with impaired coronary flow (ICF) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. In this study, we assessed the relation between a novel comprehensive biomarker, pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), and ICF after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. A total of 687 patients who underwent pPCI between 2019 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Blood samples were collected at admission. PIV and other inflammation parameters were compared. PIV was calculated as (neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count. Postprocedural coronary flow was assessed by thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) classification. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a group with ICF defined as postprocedural TIMI 0 to 2 and a group with normal coronary flow defined as postprocedural TIMI flow grade of 3. The mean age was 61 ± 12 years, and 22.4% of the patients were women. Compared with the normal coronary flow group (median 492, interquartile range 275 to 931), the ICF group (median 1,540, interquartile range 834 to 2,909) showed significantly increased PIV (p <0.001). The optimal cutoff for the PIV was 804, as determined by receiver operating characteristic curve. The incidence of ICF was 17.0% in all patients, 6.4% in low-PIV group (<804), and 34.2% in high-PIV group (≥804). Multivariate analyses revealed that a baseline PIV ≥804 was independently associated with post-pPCI ICF (odds ratio 5.226, p <0.001). PIV was superior to neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio in determining ICF. In conclusion, a high-PIV was significantly associated with an increased risk of ICF after pPCI. Moreover, PIV was a better indicator of ICF than were other inflammatory markers.