格拉斯哥昏迷指数
医学
接收机工作特性
创伤中心
损伤严重程度评分
急诊医学
死亡率
生命体征
小儿外伤
麻醉
毒物控制
伤害预防
外科
内科学
回顾性队列研究
作者
Tanner Smida,Patrick C. Bonasso,James M. Bardes,Bradley S. Price,Federico G. Seifarth,Lori A. Gurien,Robert E. Maxson,Robert W. Letton
出处
期刊:The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2024-01-26
被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1097/ta.0000000000004258
摘要
Abstract Background Timely identification of high-risk pediatric trauma patients and appropriate resource mobilization may lead to improved outcomes. We hypothesized that reverse shock index times the motor component of the Glasgow Coma Scale (rSIM) would perform equivalently to reverse shock index times the total Glasgow Coma Scale (rSIG) in the prediction of mortality and the need for intervention following pediatric trauma. Methods The 2017-2020 National Trauma Data Bank datasets were used. We included all patients < 16 years of age that had a documented prehospital and trauma bay systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and total GCS. We excluded all patients who arrived at the trauma center without vital signs and interfacility transport patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to model the performance of each metric as a classifier with respect to our primary and secondary outcomes, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used for comparison. Our primary outcome was mortality prior to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included blood product administration or hemorrhage control intervention (surgery or angiography) < 4 hours following hospital arrival and ICU admission. Results After application of exclusion criteria, 77,996 patients were included in our analysis. rSIM and rSIG performed equivalently as predictors of mortality in the 1-2 (p = 0.05) and 3-5 (p = 0.28) year categories, but rSIM was statistically outperformed by rSIG in the 6-12 (AUC: 0.96 vs. 0.95, p = 0.04) and 13-16 (AUC: 0.96 vs. 0.95, p < 0.01) year-old age categories. rSIM and rSIG also performed similarly with respect to prediction of secondary outcomes. Conclusion rSIG and rSIM are both outstanding predictors of mortality following pediatric trauma. Statistically significant differences in favor of rSIG were noted in some age groups. Because of the simplicity of calculation, rSIM may be a useful tool for pediatric trauma triage. Level of evidence III, Diagnostic Tests or Criteria
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI