小干扰RNA
寡核苷酸
背景(考古学)
计算生物学
核糖核酸
药物发现
药品
机制(生物学)
生物
化学
药理学
生物信息学
遗传学
基因
物理
量子力学
古生物学
作者
Stanley T. Crooke,Xiaojing Liang,Rosanne M. Crooke,Brenda F. Baker,Richard S. Geary
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114196
摘要
When coined, the term “antisense” included oligonucleotides of any structure, with any chemical modification and designed to work through any post-RNA hybridization mechanism. However, in practice the term “antisense” has been used to describe single stranded oligonucleotides (ss ASOs) designed to hybridize to RNAs while the term “siRNA” has come to mean double stranded oligonucleotides designed to activate Ago2. However, the two approaches share many common features. The medicinal chemistry developed for ASOs greatly facilitated the development of siRNA technology and remains the chemical basis for both approaches. Many of challenges faced and solutions achieved share many common features. In fact, because ss ASOs can be designed to activate Ago2, the two approaches intersect at this remarkably important protein. There are also meaningful differences. The pharmacokinetic properties are quite different and thus potential routes of delivery differ. ASOs may be designed to use a variety of post-RNA binding mechanisms while siRNAs depend solely on the robust activity of Ago2. However, siRNAs and ASOs are both used for therapeutic purposes and both must be and can be understood in a pharmacological context. Thus, the goals of this review are to put ASOs in pharmacological context and compare their behavior as pharmacological agents to the those of siRNAs.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI