内存错误
认知心理学
背景(考古学)
分类
心理学
任务(项目管理)
心理信息
计算机科学
召回
人工智能
古生物学
管理
梅德林
政治学
法学
经济
生物
作者
Neil W. Mulligan,Pietro Spataro,Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud,Avery R Wall
摘要
Stimuli presented with targets during a monitoring task are better remembered than stimuli presented with distractors, a result referred to as the attentional boost effect (ABE). The ABE is consistently found for item memory, but conflicting results have been reported for different assessments of associative memory, with studies of source memory (whether the study item had been presented with a target or distractor) demonstrating an ABE and studies of context memory (memory for the perceptual details or list membership of the study item) not showing the effect. This could be due to methodological differences across studies (study materials: pictures vs. words; number of study presentations: multiple vs. single), issues related to the measurement of source memory (traditional measures vs. multinomial modeling), or differences in the informational bases of source and context memory tests. Three experiments consistently found an ABE in source memory and ruled out differences based on study materials, number of study presentations, and technique for measuring source memory. The discrepancies in the prior research appear to hinge on the differences in informational bases of source and context memory tests. In particular, source memory relies on associations between the study item and information about the monitoring task and is open to inferential processes (participants exhibit a significant bias to categorize false alarms as coming from the distractor condition). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI