医学
抗磷脂综合征
内科学
狼疮抗凝剂
羟基氯喹
队列
血栓形成
接收机工作特性
逻辑回归
系统性红斑狼疮
弗雷明翰风险评分
免疫学
传染病(医学专业)
疾病
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)
作者
Lucila García,María Sofía Velloso,María Victoria Martiré,Florencia Savy,F. Arizpe,Nadia Garcia,A. Testi,Claudia Peña,Ana Carolina Costi,C. A. Isnardi,Dafne Capelusnik,S. M. Mazza,Y. Soria Curi,Victoria Collado,María Florencia Rodríguez,Santiago Scarafia,Cecilia Pisoni,Maria de la Torre,Adriana Seewald,María Elisa Riva,Mercedes García
出处
期刊:Lupus
[SAGE]
日期:2020-10-07
卷期号:29 (14): 1866-1872
被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1177/0961203320960814
摘要
Introduction Assessment of risk both for pregnancy morbidity and thrombosis in the presence of anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL) is still a challenge in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients. The Global Antiphospholipid Syndrome Score (GAPSS) takes into account the aPL profile (criteria and non-criteria aPL), the conventional cardiovascular risk factors and the autoimmune antibody profile. An adjusted model of the score (aGAPSS) excluding anti-phosphatidylserine/Prothrombin (aPS/PT), suggests that the score is able to stratify patients for their rate of events making it widely applicable in daily clinical practice. Objective To validate the aGAPSS in a multicentric cohort of SLE patients in Argentina. Patients and methods consecutive SLE patients with and with andwithout thrombotic events from seven Rheumatologist centers were included. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors, aPL antibodies and medications received (aspirin, hydroxychloroquine and anticoagulation) were collected. The score aGAPSS was calculated for each patient at the last visit by adding together the points corresponding to the risk factors: 1 for hypertension, 3 for dyslipidemia, 4 for LA and B2GPI (IgM or IgG) antibodies and 5 for aCL (IgM or IgG) antibodies. The discriminative ability of the aGAPSS was calculated by measuring the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the impact of multiple cardiovascular risk factors and laboratory parameters on the occurrence of thrombosis. Results Two hundred and ninety-six SLE patients were included. One-hundred and twenty-one patients (40.9%) presented thrombotic and/or pregnancy complications. Median aGAPSS was significantly higher in patients who experienced an event (thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity) compared with those without [4 (IQR 1–9) versus 1 (IQR 0–5); p < 0.001]. The best cut off point for the diagnosis of thrombosis and/or pregnancy complications was aGAPSS ≥4. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that aCL antibodies [OR 2.1 (95% CI 1.16–3.90); p = 0.015] were an independent risk factors for thrombotic events. Conclusions This score is a simple tool, easy to apply to SLE patients in daily practice. The use of the aGAPSS could change the non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment in higher risk patients to improve their survival.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI