安慰剂
医学
不利影响
双盲
人口
内科学
活性代谢物
麻醉
药代动力学
环境卫生
病理
替代医学
作者
Frank C. Hampel,Michael Gillen,Shashank Rohatagi,Janet Lim,George Georges
标识
DOI:10.1177/009127002401382696
摘要
The efficacy and safety of ebastine 20 mg once daily given with and without food were compared in patients ages 12 to 70 years with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) caused by mountain cedar allergen. This double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted at six centers in Texas. Efficacy and safety analyses were performed on the intent-to-treat population, which comprised 652 patients; 540 patients completed the study. Following 2 weeks' treatment, no significant differences (p > or = 0.91) were found between the ebastine with and without food groups in the percentage change from baseline of daily "reflective" total rhinitis symptom scores (i.e., patients' assessment of severity over the previous 12 h), but both ebastine groups exhibited significantly greater reductions versus patients receiving placebo (p < 0.0001). There were also no significant differences in the percentages of patients experiencing adverse events between the ebastine with and without food groups. Mean steady-state plasma concentrations of ebastine and its active metabolite carebastine were, respectively, 5.5% (ns) and 15.1% (p < 0.05) higher when ebastine was given with food versus its administration without food. Overall, these results indicate that in clinical practice, ebastine does not need to be administered with reference to food.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI