A comparative study of two desktop hazard perception tasks suitable for mass testing in which scores are not based on response latencies

任务(项目管理) 剪辑 隐蔽的 考试(生物学) 危害 感知 应用心理学 计算机科学 心理学 认知心理学 工程类 人工智能 生物 哲学 古生物学 神经科学 有机化学 化学 系统工程 语言学
作者
W P Vlakveld
出处
期刊:Transportation Research Part F-traffic Psychology and Behaviour [Elsevier]
卷期号:22: 218-231 被引量:44
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.013
摘要

In PC-based hazard perception tests scores are traditionally based on how quickly participants respond to developing hazards in video clips. A disadvantage of this method is that latent hazards which do not develop into acute threats cannot be included in the test. The present study compared two tasks using the same stimuli but with different response methods. The stimuli consisted of thirteen animated video clips in which latent hazards did not materialize. Latent hazards could either be a visible other road user who due to the circumstances could start to act dangerously, or a hidden other road users who could be on collision course. The first-mentioned were the overt latent hazards and the latter were the covert latent hazards. In Task 1, participants had to indicate what the high priority latent hazard was after they had watched a clip. In Task 2, participants could indicate latent hazards while they were watching a clip and decide afterwards which of the indicated latent hazards had the highest priority. In both tasks the scores were based on how many high priority latent hazards were detected and were not based not on response times. Professional drivers (driver trainers and driving examiners) and learner drivers were randomly assigned to a group that performed Task 1 and a group that performed Task 2. Professionals scored significantly better on both tasks than learner drivers. Although in both tasks professionals scored significantly higher, Task 1 seems to be a more promising alternative for the traditional hazard perception test than Task 2 because professional drivers scored significantly higher on overt latent hazards than learner drivers in Task 1 but not in Task 2 and experience with computer games influenced the scores in Task 2 but not in Task 1. A weakness of Task 1 was its rather low internal consistency (α = .69).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
Ycc发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
lily关注了科研通微信公众号
2秒前
在水一方应助李多多采纳,获得10
3秒前
6秒前
净00发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
李健的粉丝团团长应助m侯采纳,获得30
6秒前
zzr123完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
zhangxr发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
淡淡的花瓣完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
李平进完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
NexusExplorer应助冷傲的帽子采纳,获得10
8秒前
duan完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
学生发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
爆米花应助净00采纳,获得10
13秒前
wdmxsmebdx完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
宓广缘完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
淡然善斓完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
MM发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
汉堡包应助阿橘采纳,获得10
18秒前
m侯发布了新的文献求助30
19秒前
我是老大应助甜甜访曼采纳,获得10
20秒前
fzy发布了新的文献求助50
21秒前
星辰大海应助负责乘风采纳,获得10
22秒前
23秒前
wanci应助庄周梦鱼采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
25秒前
Ycc发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
慕青应助YoroYoshi采纳,获得10
25秒前
刘机智完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
26秒前
27秒前
心台应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
27秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
杳鸢应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
28秒前
高分求助中
歯科矯正学 第7版(或第5版) 1004
Smart but Scattered: The Revolutionary Executive Skills Approach to Helping Kids Reach Their Potential (第二版) 1000
Semiconductor Process Reliability in Practice 720
GROUP-THEORY AND POLARIZATION ALGEBRA 500
Mesopotamian divination texts : conversing with the gods : sources from the first millennium BCE 500
Days of Transition. The Parsi Death Rituals(2011) 500
The Heath Anthology of American Literature: Early Nineteenth Century 1800 - 1865 Vol. B 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3229089
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2876882
关于积分的说明 8196780
捐赠科研通 2544248
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1374200
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 646906
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 621693