Assessment of maximal fat oxidation during exercise: A systematic review

最大VO2 医学 运动强度 物理疗法 统计 数学 内科学 心率 血压
作者
Francisco J. Amaro-Gahete,Guillermo Sanchez-Delgado,Lucas Jurado-Fasoli,Manuel J. Castillo,Jørn Wulff Helge,Jonatan R. Ruiz
出处
期刊:Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports [Wiley]
被引量:26
标识
DOI:10.1111/sms.13424
摘要

Maximal fat oxidation during exercise (MFO) and the exercise intensity eliciting MFO (Fatmax ) are considered biological markers of metabolic health and performance. A wide range of studies have been performed to increase our knowledge about their regulation by exercise and/or nutritional intervention. However, numerous data collection and analysis approaches have been applied, which may have affected the MFO and Fatmax estimation. We aimed to systematically review the available studies describing and/or comparing different data collection and analysis approach factors that could affect MFO and Fatmax estimation in healthy individuals and patients. Two independent researchers performed the search. We included all original studies in which MFO and/or Fatmax were estimated by indirect calorimetry through an incremental graded exercise protocol published from 2002 to 2019. This systematic review provides key information about the factors that could affect MFO and Fatmax estimation: ergometer type, metabolic cart used, warm-up duration and intensity, stage duration and intensities imposed in the graded exercise protocol, time interval selected for data analysis, stoichiometric equation selected to estimate fat oxidation, data analysis approach, time of the day when the test was performed, fasting time/previous meal before the test, and testing days for MFO/Fatmax and maximal oxygen uptake assessment. We suggest that researchers measuring MFO and Fatmax should take into account these key methodological issues that can considerably affect the accuracy, validity, and reliability of the measurement. Likewise, when comparing different studies, it is important to check whether the above-mentioned key methodological issues are similar in such studies to avoid ambiguous and unacceptable comparisons.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
chengya完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
yml完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
活泼的牛青完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
KEHUGE完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
李静完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
后陡门爱神完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
方方完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
明理宛秋完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
小会完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
ZQ完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
YangSY完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
goweller完成签到 ,获得积分0
11秒前
科研王子完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
小芳芳完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
was_3完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
菓小柒发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
xianjingli完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
英俊的铭应助明理的南风采纳,获得10
19秒前
草原狼完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
ironsilica完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
飘萍过客完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
小亮哈哈完成签到,获得积分0
21秒前
LL完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
qiancib202完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
SciGPT应助564654SDA采纳,获得10
24秒前
25秒前
25秒前
xx完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
鲨鱼也蛀牙完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
Stanfuny完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
无语的之桃完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
cq_2完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
Zangzang完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
de完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
大模型应助pgg采纳,获得10
29秒前
30秒前
zhouyou完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
高分求助中
Impact of Mitophagy-Related Genes on the Diagnosis and Development of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma via Single-Cell RNA-seq Analysis and Machine Learning Algorithms 1600
Exploring Mitochondrial Autophagy Dysregulation in Osteosarcoma: Its Implications for Prognosis and Targeted Therapy 1500
LNG地下式貯槽指針(JGA指-107) 1000
LNG地上式貯槽指針 (JGA指 ; 108) 1000
Raising Girls With ADHD: Secrets for Parenting Healthy, Happy Daughters 900
QMS18Ed2 | process management. 2nd ed 600
LNG as a marine fuel—Safety and Operational Guidelines - Bunkering 560
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 免疫学 细胞生物学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2940708
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2599566
关于积分的说明 6998283
捐赠科研通 2240913
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1189693
版权声明 590231
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 582402