Assessment of maximal fat oxidation during exercise: A systematic review

最大VO2 医学 运动强度 物理疗法 统计 数学 内科学 心率 血压
作者
Francisco J. Amaro-Gahete,Guillermo Sanchez-Delgado,Lucas Jurado-Fasoli,Manuel J. Castillo,Jørn Wulff Helge,Jonatan R. Ruiz
出处
期刊:Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports [Wiley]
被引量:26
标识
DOI:10.1111/sms.13424
摘要

Maximal fat oxidation during exercise (MFO) and the exercise intensity eliciting MFO (Fatmax ) are considered biological markers of metabolic health and performance. A wide range of studies have been performed to increase our knowledge about their regulation by exercise and/or nutritional intervention. However, numerous data collection and analysis approaches have been applied, which may have affected the MFO and Fatmax estimation. We aimed to systematically review the available studies describing and/or comparing different data collection and analysis approach factors that could affect MFO and Fatmax estimation in healthy individuals and patients. Two independent researchers performed the search. We included all original studies in which MFO and/or Fatmax were estimated by indirect calorimetry through an incremental graded exercise protocol published from 2002 to 2019. This systematic review provides key information about the factors that could affect MFO and Fatmax estimation: ergometer type, metabolic cart used, warm-up duration and intensity, stage duration and intensities imposed in the graded exercise protocol, time interval selected for data analysis, stoichiometric equation selected to estimate fat oxidation, data analysis approach, time of the day when the test was performed, fasting time/previous meal before the test, and testing days for MFO/Fatmax and maximal oxygen uptake assessment. We suggest that researchers measuring MFO and Fatmax should take into account these key methodological issues that can considerably affect the accuracy, validity, and reliability of the measurement. Likewise, when comparing different studies, it is important to check whether the above-mentioned key methodological issues are similar in such studies to avoid ambiguous and unacceptable comparisons.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
HhhhL完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
YZzzJ完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
jun发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
疯了半天完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
ding应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
彭于晏应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
HEIKU应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
思源应助赏你半斤地瓜烧采纳,获得10
1秒前
英俊的铭应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
CodeCraft应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
上官若男应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
烟花应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
2秒前
云瑾应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
HEIKU应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
香蕉茹妖完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
好困应助summer采纳,获得10
3秒前
ZSQ发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
852应助科研小垃圾采纳,获得10
4秒前
苗条的善斓完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
申雪狐发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
zy完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
沈呆呆完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
慕容博发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
大胆小鸽子完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
Kikisong完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
1337003319完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Roy完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
ZYX完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
凯撒的归凯撒完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
LC发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
XAFS for Everyone 500
COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY & SKINCARE PRACTICE 388
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3143088
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2794180
关于积分的说明 7810221
捐赠科研通 2450424
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1303824
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 627066
版权声明 601384