Effect of appropriate combination therapy on mortality of patients with bloodstream infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (INCREMENT): a retrospective cohort study

医学 联合疗法 回顾性队列研究 队列 倾向得分匹配 混淆 内科学 药物治疗 死亡率 队列研究
作者
Belén Gutiérrez‐Gutiérrez,Elena Salamanca,Marina de Cueto,Po‐Ren Hsueh,Pierluigi Viale,José Ramón Paño‐Pardo,Mario Venditti,Mario Tumbarello,George L. Daikos,Rafael Cantón,Yohei Doi,Felipe Francisco Tuon,Ilias Karaiskos,Elena Pérez‐Nadales,Mitchell J. Schwaber,Özlem Kurt Azap,Maria Souli,Emmanuel Roilides,Spyros Pournaras,Murat Akova
出处
期刊:Lancet Infectious Diseases [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:17 (7): 726-734 被引量:480
标识
DOI:10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30228-1
摘要

The best available treatment against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) is unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of appropriate therapy and of appropriate combination therapy on mortality of patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to CPE.In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients with clinically significant monomicrobial BSIs due to CPE from the INCREMENT cohort, recruited from 26 tertiary hospitals in ten countries. Exclusion criteria were missing key data, death sooner than 24 h after the index date, therapy with an active antibiotic for at least 2 days when blood cultures were taken, and subsequent episodes in the same patient. We compared 30 day all-cause mortality between patients receiving appropriate (including an active drug against the blood isolate and started in the first 5 days after infection) or inappropriate therapy, and for patients receiving appropriate therapy, between those receiving active monotherapy (only one active drug) or combination therapy (more than one). We used a propensity score for receiving combination therapy and a validated mortality score (INCREMENT-CPE mortality score) to control for confounders in Cox regression analyses. We stratified analyses of combination therapy according to INCREMENT-CPE mortality score (0-7 [low mortality score] vs 8-15 [high mortality score]). INCREMENT is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01764490.Between Jan 1, 2004, and Dec 31, 2013, 480 patients with BSIs due to CPE were enrolled in the INCREMENT cohort, of whom we included 437 (91%) in this study. 343 (78%) patients received appropriate therapy compared with 94 (22%) who received inappropriate therapy. The most frequent organism was Klebsiella pneumoniae (375 [86%] of 437; 291 [85%] of 343 patients receiving appropriate therapy vs 84 [89%] of 94 receiving inappropriate therapy) and the most frequent carbapenemase was K pneumoniae carbapenemase (329 [75%]; 253 [74%] vs 76 [81%]). Appropriate therapy was associated with lower mortality than was inappropriate therapy (132 [38·5%] of 343 patients died vs 57 [60·6%] of 94; absolute difference 22·1% [95% CI 11·0-33·3]; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·45 [95% CI 0·33-0·62]; p<0·0001). Among those receiving appropriate therapy, 135 (39%) received combination therapy and 208 (61%) received monotherapy. Overall mortality was not different between those receiving combination therapy or monotherapy (47 [35%] of 135 vs 85 [41%] of 208; adjusted HR 1·63 [95% CI 0·67-3·91]; p=0·28). However, combination therapy was associated with lower mortality than was monotherapy in the high-mortality-score stratum (30 [48%] of 63 vs 64 [62%] of 103; adjusted HR 0·56 [0·34-0·91]; p=0·02), but not in the low-mortality-score stratum (17 [24%] of 72 vs 21 [20%] of 105; adjusted odds ratio 1·21 [0·56-2·56]; p=0·62).Appropriate therapy was associated with a protective effect on mortality among patients with BSIs due to CPE. Combination therapy was associated with improved survival only in patients with a high mortality score. Patients with BSIs due to CPE should receive active therapy as soon as they are diagnosed, and monotherapy should be considered for those in the low-mortality-score stratum.Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases, European Development Regional Fund, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, and Innovative Medicines Initiative.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Lucas应助念姬采纳,获得10
刚刚
科目三应助新疆彭于晏采纳,获得10
1秒前
xusuizi发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
热锅上的蚂蚁完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
丰富的绮波完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
靓丽白卉完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
RosyBai发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
LMH发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
小灰灰完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
lifeon关注了科研通微信公众号
8秒前
wanci应助RosyBai采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
11秒前
LJJZZX完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
科研狗完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
哌替啶驳回了LBX应助
12秒前
桐桐应助木子木子粒采纳,获得10
13秒前
英姑应助科研鸟采纳,获得10
14秒前
zzzzzyy发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
Mayday发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
gean发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
Jasper应助zhuzhu的江湖采纳,获得10
16秒前
懒大王完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
依依完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
666应助gean采纳,获得10
19秒前
BEST完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
22秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
24秒前
共享精神应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
24秒前
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
24秒前
24秒前
可爱的函函应助cuckoo采纳,获得10
24秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
24秒前
完美世界应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
24秒前
24秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Technical Brochure TB 814: LPIT applications in HV gas insulated switchgear 1000
Immigrant Incorporation in East Asian Democracies 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3966388
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3511817
关于积分的说明 11160082
捐赠科研通 3246443
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1793422
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 874427
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 804388