Effect of appropriate combination therapy on mortality of patients with bloodstream infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (INCREMENT): a retrospective cohort study

医学 联合疗法 回顾性队列研究 队列 倾向得分匹配 混淆 内科学 药物治疗 死亡率 队列研究
作者
Belén Gutiérrez‐Gutiérrez,Elena Salamanca,Marina de Cueto,Po‐Ren Hsueh,Pierluigi Viale,José Ramón Paño‐Pardo,Mario Venditti,Mario Tumbarello,George L. Daikos,Rafael Cantón,Yohei Doi,Felipe Francisco Tuon,Ilias Karaiskos,Elena Pérez‐Nadales,Mitchell J. Schwaber,Özlem Kurt Azap,Maria Souli,Emmanuel Roilides,Spyros Pournaras,Murat Akova
出处
期刊:Lancet Infectious Diseases [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:17 (7): 726-734 被引量:480
标识
DOI:10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30228-1
摘要

The best available treatment against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) is unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of appropriate therapy and of appropriate combination therapy on mortality of patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to CPE.In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients with clinically significant monomicrobial BSIs due to CPE from the INCREMENT cohort, recruited from 26 tertiary hospitals in ten countries. Exclusion criteria were missing key data, death sooner than 24 h after the index date, therapy with an active antibiotic for at least 2 days when blood cultures were taken, and subsequent episodes in the same patient. We compared 30 day all-cause mortality between patients receiving appropriate (including an active drug against the blood isolate and started in the first 5 days after infection) or inappropriate therapy, and for patients receiving appropriate therapy, between those receiving active monotherapy (only one active drug) or combination therapy (more than one). We used a propensity score for receiving combination therapy and a validated mortality score (INCREMENT-CPE mortality score) to control for confounders in Cox regression analyses. We stratified analyses of combination therapy according to INCREMENT-CPE mortality score (0-7 [low mortality score] vs 8-15 [high mortality score]). INCREMENT is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01764490.Between Jan 1, 2004, and Dec 31, 2013, 480 patients with BSIs due to CPE were enrolled in the INCREMENT cohort, of whom we included 437 (91%) in this study. 343 (78%) patients received appropriate therapy compared with 94 (22%) who received inappropriate therapy. The most frequent organism was Klebsiella pneumoniae (375 [86%] of 437; 291 [85%] of 343 patients receiving appropriate therapy vs 84 [89%] of 94 receiving inappropriate therapy) and the most frequent carbapenemase was K pneumoniae carbapenemase (329 [75%]; 253 [74%] vs 76 [81%]). Appropriate therapy was associated with lower mortality than was inappropriate therapy (132 [38·5%] of 343 patients died vs 57 [60·6%] of 94; absolute difference 22·1% [95% CI 11·0-33·3]; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·45 [95% CI 0·33-0·62]; p<0·0001). Among those receiving appropriate therapy, 135 (39%) received combination therapy and 208 (61%) received monotherapy. Overall mortality was not different between those receiving combination therapy or monotherapy (47 [35%] of 135 vs 85 [41%] of 208; adjusted HR 1·63 [95% CI 0·67-3·91]; p=0·28). However, combination therapy was associated with lower mortality than was monotherapy in the high-mortality-score stratum (30 [48%] of 63 vs 64 [62%] of 103; adjusted HR 0·56 [0·34-0·91]; p=0·02), but not in the low-mortality-score stratum (17 [24%] of 72 vs 21 [20%] of 105; adjusted odds ratio 1·21 [0·56-2·56]; p=0·62).Appropriate therapy was associated with a protective effect on mortality among patients with BSIs due to CPE. Combination therapy was associated with improved survival only in patients with a high mortality score. Patients with BSIs due to CPE should receive active therapy as soon as they are diagnosed, and monotherapy should be considered for those in the low-mortality-score stratum.Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases, European Development Regional Fund, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, and Innovative Medicines Initiative.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
xiaowan完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
小伍发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
CC完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
mouhao1发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Sega完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
谢戴竹完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
陈情完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助150
5秒前
浮游应助ZHOUZHOU采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
小二郎应助认真的不斜采纳,获得10
6秒前
熊11发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
科研工头发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
北陌完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
浮游应助lyyy采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
情怀应助Atticus采纳,获得10
9秒前
11秒前
泡沫完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
TANG完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
Gakay发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
gogogre发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
dwj发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
菠萝李完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
赘婿应助细腻听白采纳,获得10
18秒前
阿崔发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
英勇哈密瓜数据线完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
清竹完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
无花果应助hu采纳,获得10
21秒前
阿怪发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
浮游应助grumpysquirel采纳,获得10
23秒前
dwj完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
万能图书馆应助Akiba采纳,获得10
24秒前
pearer完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
高分求助中
Comprehensive Toxicology Fourth Edition 24000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Pipeline and riser loss of containment 2001 - 2020 (PARLOC 2020) 1000
World Nuclear Fuel Report: Global Scenarios for Demand and Supply Availability 2025-2040 800
Handbook of Social and Emotional Learning 800
Risankizumab Versus Ustekinumab For Patients with Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease: Results from the Phase 3B SEQUENCE Study 600
Lloyd's Register of Shipping's Approach to the Control of Incidents of Brittle Fracture in Ship Structures 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5143039
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4341079
关于积分的说明 13519541
捐赠科研通 4181353
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2292877
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1293512
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1236099