Analysis of aggregate surgically induced refractive change, prediction error, and intraocular astigmatism

屈光度 医学 数学 激光矫视 眼科 散光 正视 折射率 折射误差 折射 标准差 人工晶状体 验光服务 视力 光学 白内障手术 角膜磨镶术 角膜 材料科学 超声乳化术 统计 物理
作者
Jack T. Holladay,John R Moran,Guy M Kezirian
出处
期刊:Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:27 (1): 61-79 被引量:265
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00796-3
摘要

To demonstrate analytical methods for evaluating the results of keratorefractive surgical procedures and emphasize the importance of intraocular astigmatism.University of Texas Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA.A standard data set, provided by an editor of this journal, comprising the preoperative and postoperative keratometric and refractive measurements of 100 eyes that had keratorefractive surgery was evaluated by 2 methods, vector and spheroequivalent (SEQ) analysis. The individual and aggregate surgically induced refractive changes (SIRCs) and prediction errors were determined from the refractive and keratometric measurements using both methods and then compared. The refraction vertex distance, keratometric index of refraction, and corneal asphericity were used to make the results calculated from refractive data directly comparable to those derived from keratometric data. Doubled-angle and equivalency plots as well as frequency and cumulative histograms were used to display the data. Standard descriptive statistics were used to determine the mean and standard deviation of the aggregate induced astigmatism after converting the polar values (cylinder and axis) to Cartesian (x and y) values.The preoperative SEQ refractive errors were undercorrected by at least 0.25 diopter (D) in most cases (78%). Six percent were corrected within +/- 0.24 D, and 16% were overcorrected by at least 0.25 D SEQ. The mean SEQ was -6.68 D +/- 2.49 (SD) before and -0.61 +/- 0.82 D after surgery, reflecting a SIRC SEQ of -6.07 +/- 2.40 D. The defocus equivalent (DEQ) was 7.41 +/- 2.53 D before and 0.96 +/- 0.74 D after surgery; for a nominal 3.0 mm pupil, this corresponded to an estimated improvement in uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) from worse than 20/200 to better than 20/25, respectively. The predictability of the treatment decreased as the attempted refractive correction increased. The average magnitude of the refractive astigmatism was 1.46 +/- 0.61 D before and 0.40 +/- 0.38 D after surgery. The centroid of the refractive astigmatism was +0.96 x 87.9 +/- 0.85 D, rho = 0.43 before and +0.11 x 83.1 +/- 0.37, rho = 0.49 after surgery. The decrease in the square root of the centroid standard deviation shape factor (rho1/2) indicated an 8% increase in the amount of oblique astigmatism in the population. The prevalence of preoperative keratometric irregular astigmatism in excess of 0.5 D in this group of patients was 13%. The correlation between keratometric and refractive astigmatism was extremely poor before (r2 = 0.26) and especially after surgery (r2 = 0.02), demonstrating the presence of intraocular astigmatism and the limitations of manual keratometry. The centroid of intraocular astigmatism at the corneal plane was +0.48 x 178 +/- 0.49 D, rho = 0.59, and was compensatory.The 2 analytical methods are complimentary and permit thorough and quantitative evaluation of SIRCs and allow valid statistical comparisons within and between data sets. The DEQ allows comparison of refractive and visual results. The decrease in refractive predictability with higher corrections is well demonstrated by the SEQ and doubled-angle plots of the SIRC. Doubled-angle plots were particularly useful in interpreting errors of cylinder treatment amount and errors in alignment. The correlation between refractive and keratometric astigmatism was poor for preoperative, postoperative, and SIRC data, indicating the presence of astigmatic elements beyond the corneal surface (ie, intraocular astigmatism). Sources of error in refractive outcome statistics include the use of multiple lens systems in the phoropter, errors in vertex calculations, difficulty in accurately defining the axis of astigmatism, and failure to consider measurement errors when working with keratometric data. The analysis of this particular data set demonstrates the significant clinical benefits of refractive surgery: an 8-fold increase in UCVA, an 11-fold decrease in SEQ refractive error, as well as a 9-fold and nearly a 2 1/2-fold decrease in the magnitude and distribution of astigmatism, respectively.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
dling02完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
是天使呢完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
内向秋寒发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
cc发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
ding应助zhui采纳,获得10
2秒前
drwang120完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
坨坨西州完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
海绵体宝宝应助Louise采纳,获得20
3秒前
小马甲应助lichaoyes采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
坨坨西州发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
彬彬发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
大模型应助Abao采纳,获得10
5秒前
sfw驳回了苏照杭应助
6秒前
dingdong发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
别拖延了要毕业啊完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
Rrr发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
dingdong发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
yuan发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
cc完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
一一发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
领导范儿应助Chridy采纳,获得10
12秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Social media impact on athlete mental health: #RealityCheck 1020
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527849
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3107938
关于积分的说明 9287239
捐赠科研通 2805706
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1540033
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716893
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709794