Once-weekly dulaglutide versus once-daily liraglutide in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-6): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

杜拉鲁肽 利拉鲁肽 医学 2型糖尿病 打开标签 内科学 二甲双胍 随机对照试验 糖尿病 内分泌学 胰岛素
作者
Kathleen Dungan,Santiago Tofé,Thomas Först,José Gerardo González‐González,Charles Atisso,Whitney Sealls,Jessie L. Fahrbach
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier]
卷期号:384 (9951): 1349-1357 被引量:477
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60976-4
摘要

Background Dulaglutide and liraglutide, both glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, improve glycaemic control and reduce weight in patients with type 2 diabetes. In a head-to-head trial, we compared the safety and efficacy of once-weekly dulaglutide with that of once-daily liraglutide in metformin-treated patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Methods We did a phase 3, randomised, open-label, parallel-group study at 62 sites in nine countries between June 20, 2012, and Nov 25, 2013. Patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes receiving metformin (≥1500 mg/day), aged 18 years or older, with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 7·0% or greater (≥53 mmol/mol) and 10·0% or lower (≤86 mmol/mol), and body-mass index 45 kg/m2 or lower were randomly assigned to receive once-weekly dulaglutide (1·5 mg) or once-daily liraglutide (1·8 mg). Randomisation was done according to a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive voice response system. Participants and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was non-inferiority (margin 0·4%) of dulaglutide compared with liraglutide for change in HbA1c (least-squares mean change from baseline) at 26 weeks. Safety data were collected for a further 4 weeks' follow-up. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01624259. Findings We randomly assigned 599 patients to receive once-weekly dulaglutide (299 patients) or once-daily liraglutide (300 patients). 269 participants in each group completed treatment at week 26. Least-squares mean reduction in HbA1c was −1·42% (SE 0·05) in the dulaglutide group and −1·36% (0·05) in the liraglutide group. Mean treatment difference in HbA1c was −0·06% (95% CI −0·19 to 0·07, pnon-inferiority<0·0001) between the two groups. The most common gastrointestinal adverse events were nausea (61 [20%] in dulaglutide group vs 54 [18%] in liraglutide group), diarrhoea (36 [12%] vs 36 [12%]), dyspepsia (24 [8%] vs 18 [6%]), and vomiting (21 [7%] vs 25 [8%]), with similar rates of study or study drug discontinuation because of adverse events between the two groups (18 [6%] in each group). The hypoglycaemia rate was 0·34 (SE 1·44) and 0·52 (3·01) events per patient per year, respectively, and no severe hypoglycaemia was reported. Interpretation Once-weekly dulaglutide is non-inferior to once-daily liraglutide for least-squares mean reduction in HbA1c, with a similar safety and tolerability profile. Funding Eli Lilly and Company.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
21232完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
黄啊涛发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
无花果应助jj采纳,获得10
刚刚
pluto应助ljy采纳,获得60
刚刚
新手菜鸟发布了新的文献求助20
刚刚
打嗝海獭完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
无花果应助kristen采纳,获得10
2秒前
科研通AI6.1应助CHINA_C13采纳,获得10
2秒前
小样发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
科研通AI6.3应助pinecone采纳,获得10
3秒前
Jasper应助ylz采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
新手菜鸟完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
GZC完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
热心市民小杨应助周em12_采纳,获得10
7秒前
gyh应助11采纳,获得10
8秒前
aging00完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
LiuZhaoYuan完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
YXT981221发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
liu完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
安子完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
winni完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
华仔应助小布丁采纳,获得10
15秒前
17秒前
huan完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
zrkkk完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
19秒前
仙女的小可爱完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
香妃完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
充电宝应助小雒雒采纳,获得10
21秒前
lxh完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
勤奋乐天完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Propeller Design 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6015188
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7591009
关于积分的说明 16148068
捐赠科研通 5162807
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2764194
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1744655
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1634650