医学
全国健康与营养检查调查
老年学
置信区间
逻辑回归
纵向研究
优势比
认知
前瞻性队列研究
队列研究
健康与退休研究
人口学
物理疗法
内科学
环境卫生
人口
精神科
病理
社会学
作者
Xingqi Cao,Chen Chen,Jingyun Zhang,Qian‐Li Xue,Emiel O. Hoogendijk,Xiaoting Liu,Shujuan Li,Xiaofeng Wang,Yimin Zhu,Zuyun Liu
标识
DOI:10.1186/s12877-022-02913-y
摘要
Aging metrics incorporating cognitive and physical function are not fully understood, hampering their utility in research and clinical practice. This study aimed to determine the proportions of vulnerable persons identified by three existing aging metrics that incorporate cognitive and physical function and the associations of the three metrics with mortality.We considered three existing aging metrics including the combined presence of cognitive impairment and physical frailty (CI-PF), the frailty index (FI), and the motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR). We operationalized them using data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) and the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Logistic regression models or Cox proportional hazards regression models, and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to examine the associations of the three metrics with mortality.In CHARLS, the proportions of vulnerable persons identified by CI-PF, FI, and MCR were 2.2, 16.6, and 19.6%, respectively. Each metric predicted mortality after adjustment for age and sex, with some variations in the strength of the associations (CI-PF, odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) 2.87 (1.74-4.74); FI, OR (95% CI) 1.94 (1.50-2.50); MCR, OR (95% CI) 1.27 (1.00-1.62)). CI-PF and FI had additional predictive utility beyond age and sex, as demonstrated by integrated discrimination improvement and continuous net reclassification improvement (all P < 0.001). These results were replicated in NHANES.Despite the inherent differences in the aging metrics incorporating cognitive and physical function, they consistently capture mortality risk. The findings support the incorporation of cognitive and physical function for risk stratification in both Chinese and US persons, but call for caution when applying them in specific study settings.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI