Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

医学 危险系数 随机对照试验 胰腺癌 放射治疗 内科学 荟萃分析 肿瘤科 临床试验 科克伦图书馆 置信区间 化疗 相对风险 外科 癌症
作者
Ismael Ghanem,David Lora,N. Herradón,G. de Velasco,Alberto Carretero-González,Miguel Ángel Jiménez Varas,P. Vázquez de Parga,Jaime Feliú
出处
期刊:ESMO open [Elsevier]
卷期号:7 (3): 100485-100485 被引量:21
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100485
摘要

•Nowadays, US followed by adjuvant treatment is the most accepted approach for RPC.•NC improves DFS and OS in RPC.•NC increases the R0 ReR in RPC.•Ongoing randomized clinical trials should confirm the benefit of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX to generalize the indication. BackgroundThe role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) in resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) has yet to be defined. This review aims to analyze the benefit of NC in RPC compared with upfront surgery (US) in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).Patients and methodsPubMed, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), and Embase were systematically reviewed until 3 November 2021. Abstract proceedings and virtual meeting presentations from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society of Medical Oncology conferences, reference articles of published clinical trials, and review articles were considered. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing NC administration with or without radiotherapy previous with surgery (experimental arm) versus US followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy (control arm) for RPC were included.ResultsA total of 1135 studies were screened. Of these, 1117 studies were primarily excluded. Of the remaining 18 studies, 5 were excluded because of no adequate trial design for this work and 7 others had no available results. Finally, 6 trials with 469 patients with pancreatic cancer randomized to NC (n = 212) or US (n = 257) were selected. Compared with US, NC significantly improved OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-0.98; P = 0.033] and DFS (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.59-0.89; P = 0.002). While the NC approach was not significantly associated with lower resection rate [relative risk (RR) 0.92; 95% CI 0.84-1.01; P = 0.069], the R0 resection rate was significantly higher for NC than for US (RR 1.31; 95% CI 1.13-1.52; P = 0.0004).ConclusionThis is the first meta-analysis of RCTs showing that NC improves OS for RPC compared with US followed by adjuvant therapy. Ongoing RCTs should confirm these findings with FOLFIRINOX to generalize the indication of NC. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) in resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) has yet to be defined. This review aims to analyze the benefit of NC in RPC compared with upfront surgery (US) in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). PubMed, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), and Embase were systematically reviewed until 3 November 2021. Abstract proceedings and virtual meeting presentations from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society of Medical Oncology conferences, reference articles of published clinical trials, and review articles were considered. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing NC administration with or without radiotherapy previous with surgery (experimental arm) versus US followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy (control arm) for RPC were included. A total of 1135 studies were screened. Of these, 1117 studies were primarily excluded. Of the remaining 18 studies, 5 were excluded because of no adequate trial design for this work and 7 others had no available results. Finally, 6 trials with 469 patients with pancreatic cancer randomized to NC (n = 212) or US (n = 257) were selected. Compared with US, NC significantly improved OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-0.98; P = 0.033] and DFS (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.59-0.89; P = 0.002). While the NC approach was not significantly associated with lower resection rate [relative risk (RR) 0.92; 95% CI 0.84-1.01; P = 0.069], the R0 resection rate was significantly higher for NC than for US (RR 1.31; 95% CI 1.13-1.52; P = 0.0004). This is the first meta-analysis of RCTs showing that NC improves OS for RPC compared with US followed by adjuvant therapy. Ongoing RCTs should confirm these findings with FOLFIRINOX to generalize the indication of NC.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
SHIROKO完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
1111发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
zrr留下了新的社区评论
5秒前
heisa完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
酷波er应助YUILI采纳,获得10
7秒前
Owen应助guozizi采纳,获得30
8秒前
jingjing-8995完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
上官若男应助云鹤采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
无花果应助顾安安采纳,获得10
12秒前
包女士发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
充电宝应助豆⑧采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
万万想到了完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
Ren发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
小盒儿完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
花会发完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
QR发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
19秒前
aura完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
啵啵鱼发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
22秒前
aura发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
清风发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
汉堡包应助小黄加油鸭采纳,获得10
25秒前
chen应助儒雅沛蓝采纳,获得20
25秒前
27秒前
27秒前
28秒前
豆⑧发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
M郑完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
小余完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
隐形曼青应助唠叨的曼雁采纳,获得100
33秒前
飞羽发布了新的文献求助30
33秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2500
Востребованный временем 2500
Aspects of Babylonian celestial divination : the lunar eclipse tablets of enuma anu enlil 1500
Agaricales of New Zealand 1: Pluteaceae - Entolomataceae 1040
Healthcare Finance: Modern Financial Analysis for Accelerating Biomedical Innovation 1000
Classics in Total Synthesis IV: New Targets, Strategies, Methods 1000
지식생태학: 생태학, 죽은 지식을 깨우다 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 纳米技术 内科学 物理 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 细胞生物学 免疫学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3459121
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3053676
关于积分的说明 9037638
捐赠科研通 2742926
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1504571
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 695334
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 694605