Practical issues related to uterine pathology: in situ and invasive cervical glandular lesions and their benign mimics: emphasis on cytology–histology correlation and interpretive pitfalls

In situ and invasive neoplastic glandular lesions of the uterine have cytologic correlates that must be distinguished from a variety of benign and reactive conditions. Careful study of the cytologic features allows discrimination in the majority of cases; however, the designation of 'atypical glandular cells' is reserved for equivocal cases that cannot be readily resolved. In this article, the cytologic features of endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ and invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma will be presented, highlighting their correlation to the well-known histologic features. Variants of the usual type of endocervical neoplasms that have important clinical and differential diagnostic features, including mucinous adenocarcinoma and clear-cell carcinoma, will be discussed. There are a number of common cytologic mimics of endocervical neoplasms, including tubal metaplasia, directly sampled (abraded) endometrium, and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion involving endocervical glands. The cytologic features of these entities and their differentiation from endocervical neoplasia will be explored. Finally, the role of ancillary studies such as human papillomavirus testing in the management of glandular lesions of the cervix will be integrated into the discussion.