2888 Hospitalization for Colonoscopy Preparation and Its Effects on Prep Quality

医学 结肠镜检查 加药 泻药 结直肠癌 家庭医学 急诊医学 内科学 癌症 便秘
作者
Hani El-Halawany,Shahid Nawaz Khan,Ahmed A. Elkafrawy,Iqra Choudhry,J. S. Poonia,Khalil Abuamr
出处
期刊:The American Journal of Gastroenterology [American College of Gastroenterology]
卷期号:114 (1): S1582-S1582
标识
DOI:10.14309/01.ajg.0000601084.21538.d3
摘要

INTRODUCTION: Colonoscopy is the most commonly used method for colon cancer screening. The quality of prep greatly affects the examination. Risk factors for inadequate prep include prior inadequate prep, male gender, prior surgery, diabetes, low health literacy and cognitive delay. Studies have shown improvement in colonoscopy prep using split-dosing however despite this, inadequate prep continues to be a problem. One solution at our institution is to hospitalize selected patients with prior failed outpatient colonoscopy prep in an attempt to improve the prep quality. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients who were hospitalized for colonoscopy prep from 2016 to 2018. Patients who did not have documentation of prep quality were excluded. Data including age, gender, indication for procedure and presence of risk factors was gathered. The prior prep quality and prep quality after admission was documented. RESULTS: 122 patients were included in the study. “Screening” was the most common indication for the procedure. Most of the patients had at least one risk factor for inadequate prep. 90 patients had improvement in their prep quality. CONCLUSION: Bowel prep continues to be inadequate in up to 25% of examinations. Several patient related risk factors for inadequate prep have been identified in previous studies. Patients who have risk factors for slow bowel transit such as immobility, CVA and chronic use of narcotics can also be factors in colon prep. We believe the improvement in bowel prep in our study is related to adherence to dietary restrictions, accurate laxative consumption, and improved assessment of stool clearance. Our study also showed a significant number of improved bowel prep quality in patients who had risk factors for poor prep. The cost of hospitalization was not evaluated in our study. We believe that an adequate bowel would result in a longer time-interval for subsequent colonoscopies and reduced overall cost. Our study is limited given its retrospective design and small number of patients. In addition, given that our software does not allow use of the Boston Bowel Prep Scale, the results may be difficult to generalize to other populations. Repeat studies would be needed to assess cost effectiveness. Quality of bowel prep continues to be a barrier to high quality colonoscopy. This study shows that hospitalized bowel prep may help improve prep quality in a select group of patients in the underserved population and with known risk factors.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
jpp123发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
万能图书馆应助ljh采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
Lucille发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
脑洞疼应助小吴采纳,获得10
3秒前
柠小檬c发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
高贵紫丝发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
糖糖发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Yuanyuan发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
执着的灯泡完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
传奇3应助yq采纳,获得30
7秒前
肥肥猪完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
fanfanfan完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
精明平露发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
秋季完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
桐桐应助淡定采纳,获得10
11秒前
英姑应助杨炀采纳,获得10
13秒前
Lucille完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
小东西725发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
Ivan关注了科研通微信公众号
18秒前
今后应助mint采纳,获得10
18秒前
暮桉完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
小稻草人发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
22秒前
liushuo发布了新的文献求助30
22秒前
23秒前
24秒前
Babyblue完成签到,获得积分20
24秒前
24秒前
Hello应助笨笨芯采纳,获得10
25秒前
25秒前
研友_8QxN1Z发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
27秒前
28秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2500
Востребованный временем 2500
Agaricales of New Zealand 1: Pluteaceae - Entolomataceae 1040
지식생태학: 생태학, 죽은 지식을 깨우다 600
海南省蛇咬伤流行病学特征与预后影响因素分析 500
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 500
ランス多機能化技術による溶鋼脱ガス処理の高効率化の研究 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 纳米技术 内科学 物理 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 细胞生物学 免疫学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3462236
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3055862
关于积分的说明 9049551
捐赠科研通 2745410
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1506290
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 696047
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 695606