Combination of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V and Lower Tube Voltage During Craniocervical Computed Tomographic Angiography Yields Better Image Quality with a Reduced Radiation Dose

Rationale and Objectives To evaluate image quality and radiation exposure when using the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) algorithm for reconstructing craniocervical computed tomographic angiography images acquired at 100 kVp. Materials and Methods We randomly divided 121 patients into three groups: group A (conventional protocol), 120 kVp with filtered back projection; group B, 120 kVp with 50% ASIR-V; and group C, 100 kVp with 50% ASIR-V. All patients underwent scans in a 256-slice computed tomography (CT) scanner. Radiation dose (volume CT dose index), dose-length product, and effective dose, objective parameters such as arterial attenuation value, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and noise obtained at head, neck, and shoulder levels were compared among the groups. Subjective image quality was independently assessed by two radiologists, and interobserver reliability was assessed using kappa analysis. Results The radiation dose in group C was the lowest (p < 0.01) with a 40% reduction in volume CT dose index, dose-length product, and effective dose values compared to group A, and group C showed higher arterial attenuation than either group A or B (p < 0.01). Additionally, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were higher and noise was lower in groups B and C than group A. Group C had better subjective image quality than groups A and B (p < 0.05), and the interobserver reliability between the two radiologists was high (k = 0.783). Conclusion Compared to the conventional protocol, using 50% ASIR-V and the 100 kVp protocol during craniocervical computed tomographic angiography yields better objective and subjective image quality at lower radiation doses. To evaluate image quality and radiation exposure when using the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) algorithm for reconstructing craniocervical computed tomographic angiography images acquired at 100 kVp. We randomly divided 121 patients into three groups: group A (conventional protocol), 120 kVp with filtered back projection; group B, 120 kVp with 50% ASIR-V; and group C, 100 kVp with 50% ASIR-V. All patients underwent scans in a 256-slice computed tomography (CT) scanner. Radiation dose (volume CT dose index), dose-length product, and effective dose, objective parameters such as arterial attenuation value, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and noise obtained at head, neck, and shoulder levels were compared among the groups. Subjective image quality was independently assessed by two radiologists, and interobserver reliability was assessed using kappa analysis. The radiation dose in group C was the lowest (p < 0.01) with a 40% reduction in volume CT dose index, dose-length product, and effective dose values compared to group A, and group C showed higher arterial attenuation than either group A or B (p < 0.01). Additionally, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were higher and noise was lower in groups B and C than group A. Group C had better subjective image quality than groups A and B (p < 0.05), and the interobserver reliability between the two radiologists was high (k = 0.783). Compared to the conventional protocol, using 50% ASIR-V and the 100 kVp protocol during craniocervical computed tomographic angiography yields better objective and subjective image quality at lower radiation doses.