脑深部刺激
刺激
原发性震颤
医学
物理医学与康复
帕金森病
内科学
疾病
作者
Michael T. Barbe,Paul Reker,Stefanie Hamacher,Jeremy Franklin,Daria Kraus,Till A. Dembek,Johannes Becker,Julia Steffen,Niels Allert,Jochen Wirths,Haidar S. Dafsari,Jürgen Voges,Gereon R. Fink,Veerle Visser‐Vandewalle,Lars Timmermann
出处
期刊:Neurology
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2018-07-04
卷期号:91 (6)
被引量:133
标识
DOI:10.1212/wnl.0000000000005956
摘要
Objective
To evaluate deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) in essential tremor (ET) and compare it to the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM) in terms of stimulation efficacy, efficiency, and side effects. Methods
DBS leads were implanted such that contacts were placed in the VIM, on the intercommissural line, and in the PSA. Thirteen patients with ET entered a randomized, double-blind crossover phase and completed a 1-year follow-up. Results
PSA-DBS significantly reduced tremor severity and improved quality of life. There were no relevant differences in quality and frequency of stimulation side effects between VIM and PSA, with a tendency toward greater tremor improvement with PSA stimulation. Clinical benefit was achieved at significantly lower stimulation amplitudes in the PSA. The majority of patients remained with PSA-DBS after 1 year. Conclusion
In accordance with previous retrospective investigations, our prospective data suggest that PSA-DBS is at least equally effective as but possibly more efficient than VIM-DBS. Classification of evidence
This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with essential tremor, PSA-DBS is not significantly different from VIM-DBS in suppressing tremor, but clinical benefit from PSA-DBS is attained at lower stimulation amplitudes.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI