医学
折射误差
置信区间
屈光度
验光服务
人口
主观折射
眼科
视力
内科学
环境卫生
作者
Clair A. Enthoven,Jan Roelof Polling,Timo Verzijden,J. Willem L. Tideman,Nora Al-Jaffar,Pauline W. Jansen,Hein Raat,Lauwerens Metz,Virginie J. M. Verhoeven,Caroline C. W. Klaver
出处
期刊:Ophthalmology
[Elsevier]
日期:2021-07-08
卷期号:128 (12): 1681-1688
被引量:30
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.06.016
摘要
Purpose
To investigate the association between smartphone use and refractive error in teenagers using the Myopia app. Design
Cross-sectional population-based study. Participants
A total of 525 teenagers 12 to 16 years of age from 6 secondary schools and from the birth cohort study Generation R participated. Methods
A smartphone application (Myopia app; Innovattic) was designed to measure smartphone use and face-to-screen distance objectively and to pose questions about outdoor exposure. Participants underwent cycloplegic refractive error and ocular biometry measurements. Mean daily smartphone use was calculated in hours per day and continuous use as the number of episodes of 20 minutes on screen without breaks. Linear mixed models were conducted with smartphone use, continuous use, and face-to-screen distance as determinants and spherical equivalent of refraction (SER) and axial length-to-corneal radius (AL:CR) ratio as outcome measures stratified by median outdoor exposure. Main Outcome Measures
Spherical equivalent of refraction in diopters and AL:CR ratio. Results
The teenagers on average were 13.7 ± 0.85 years of age, and myopia prevalence was 18.9%. During school days, total smartphone use on average was 3.71 ± 1.70 hours/day and was associated only borderline significantly with AL:CR ratio (β = 0.008; 95% confidence interval [CI], –0.001 to 0.017) and not with SER. Continuous use on average was 6.42 ± 4.36 episodes of 20-minute use without breaks per day and was associated significantly with SER and AL:CR ratio (β = –0.07 [95% CI, –0.13 to –0.01] and β = 0.004 [95% CI, 0.001–0.008], respectively). When stratifying for outdoor exposure, continuous use remained significant only for teenagers with low exposure (β = –0.10 [95% CI, –0.20 to –0.01] and β = 0.007 [95% CI, 0.001–0.013] for SER and AL:CR ratio, respectively). Smartphone use during weekends was not associated significantly with SER and AL:CR ratio, nor was face-to-screen distance. Conclusions
Dutch teenagers spent almost 4 hours per day on their smartphones. Episodes of 20 minutes of continuous use were associated with more myopic refractive errors, particularly in those with low outdoor exposure. This study suggested that frequent breaks should become a recommendation for smartphone use in teenagers. Future large longitudinal studies will allow more detailed information on safe screen use in youth.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI