医学
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)
胃肠病学
内科学
曼惠特尼U检验
实时聚合酶链反应
作者
Joren Raymenants,Wout Duthoo,Tim Stakenborg,Bert Verbruggen,Julien Verplanken,Jos Feys,Joost Van Duppen,Rabea Hanifa,Elisabeth Marchal,Andy Lambrechts,Piet Maes,Emmanuel André,Nik Van den Wijngaert,Peter Peumans
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2022.07.069
摘要
Abstract
Background
We performed exhaled breath (EB) and nasopharyngeal (NP) qPCR and NP rapid antigen testing (RAT) throughout SARS-CoV-2 infections with different variants. Methods
We recruited immuno-naïve alpha-infected (n=11) and partly boosted omicron-infected patients (n=8) as high-risk contacts. We compared peak NP and EB qPCR cycle time (CT) values between cohorts (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test). Test positivity was compared for three infection phases (Cochran Q test). Results
Peak median NP CT was 11.5 (IQR 10.1-12.1) for alpha and 12.2 (IQR 11.1-15.3) for omicron infections. Peak median EB CT was 25.2 (IQR 24.5-26.9) and 28.3 (IQR 26.4-30.8), respectively. Distributions did not differ between cohorts for NP (p = 0.19) or EB (p = 0.09). SARS-CoV-2 shedding peaked on day 1 in EB (CI 0.0 - 4.5) and day 3 in NP (CI 1.5 - 6.0). EB qPCR positivity equaled NP qPCR positivity on D0-D1 (p=0.44) and D2-D6 (p=1.0). It superseded NP RAT positivity on D0-D1 (p=0.003) and D2-D6 (p=0.008). It was inferior to both on D7-D10 (p<0.001). Conclusions
Peak exhaled breath and nasopharynx shedding were comparable across variants. EB qPCR positivity matched NP qPCR and superseded NP RAT in the first week of infection.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI