外周穿刺中心静脉导管
医学
危险系数
前瞻性队列研究
置信区间
导管
比例危险模型
入射(几何)
队列研究
外科
单变量分析
队列
多元分析
内科学
物理
光学
作者
Kunrong Yu,Jiaqian Li,Dingding Zhang,Bing Liu,Kai Wang,Weinan Liu,Yan‐Ping Shi,Yanwei Zhao,Yan Liu,Na Guo,Wenyan Sun
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104621
摘要
Peripherally inserted central catheters are widely used in clinical practice. Despite the many advantages of peripherally inserted central catheters, unplanned removals can occur owing to irreversible complications and may have adverse consequences for patients. However, the relationship between peripherally inserted central catheter type and the incidence of unplanned removal is unclear. To investigate the association between the type of peripherally inserted central catheter and unplanned catheter removal. A multicenter prospective cohort study. Sixty hospitals located in 30 cities across seven provinces in China. Three thousand two hundred and twenty-two patients aged 18 years or older with one peripherally inserted central catheter inserted for treatment were enrolled, and 3166 (98.3 %) patients with follow-up data were included in the final analysis. The included participants had peripherally inserted central catheters that either had a proximal valve (n = 2436) or were open-ended (n = 730). A competing risk Cox regression model was used, and both univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. A sub-distribution hazard model was applied to test the validity of the results. Of the 2436 peripherally inserted central catheters with a proximal valve and 730 that were open-ended, 272 (11.2 %) and 46 (6.3 %) were removed unplanned, respectively. The whole incidence of unplanned removal was 10.04 %; multivariate Cox regression was conducted and it was determined that unplanned removal was statistically significantly associated with the proximal valve peripherally inserted central catheter type (hazard ratio: 1.86, 95 % confidence interval: 1.28 to 2.70, p = 0.001). In patients without cancer, the risk of unplanned removal of peripherally inserted central catheters with a proximal valve was 8.14 times higher than that of open-ended peripherally inserted central catheters (p < 0.001). In this study, peripherally inserted central catheters with a proximal valve had a higher risk of unplanned removals, especially in patients without cancer. The peripherally inserted central catheter type should be considered in advance, and clinical staff should take appropriate measures to prevent unplanned removals after insertion.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI