触变性
材料科学
表征(材料科学)
磁滞
水泥
流变学
产量(工程)
复合材料
纳米技术
物理
量子力学
作者
Xuping Ji,Tinghong Pan,Xingyao Liu,Wenhao Zhao,Linpu Du,Jianzhong Liu,Fangyu Han,Jianfang Sha
标识
DOI:10.1002/suco.202300220
摘要
Abstract Accurate evaluation of the thixotropy of mixtures is crucial for the design and production of self‐compacting concrete, pumped concrete, and 3D printed concrete. However, there is no uniform standard for the assessment of the thixotropy of fresh cement‐based materials. In this paper, four widely used test procedures (thixotropic index, static yield stress growth curve, thixotropic hysteresis loop area, and three‐stage curve) are compared to determine the relationships between them. The results show that the test procedures based on the break‐down (destruction) process (thixotropic index, thixotropic hysteresis loop area, and degree of breakdown) are difficult to distinguish between reversible and irreversible thixotropic structures and to accurately assess the thixotropy of mixtures. The short‐term structural build‐up rate R thix is more suitable for characterizing the thixotropic properties. The three‐stage curve can characterize both the degree of structural damage and the reconstruction ability of the paste, nano‐attapulgite clay can significantly improve the structural recovery degree of the mixture at the early hydration stage. This study will provide guidance and a theoretical framework for choosing the thixotropic characterization method of cement‐based materials in practical engineering applications.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI