新闻
认知重构
论证(复杂分析)
背景(考古学)
纪律
社会学
认识论
公民新闻
媒体研究
社会科学
政治学
法学
哲学
心理学
历史
社会心理学
化学
生物化学
考古
标识
DOI:10.1080/1461670x.2023.2190822
摘要
This response outlines points of agreement and disagreement with the argument put forward by Carlson and Peters. I argue that their provocation is largely correct in identifying Journalism Studies’ disciplinary blinders. However, I see these blinders less rooted in industry assumptions, as they contend, than in a larger array of assumptions which we do well to reflect on. I conclude that the solution is less one of decentering journalism than it is reframing journalism in a broader context.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI