A Systematic Review of the Different Calculation Methods for Measuring Jump Height During the Countermovement and Drop Jump Tests

跳跃 跳跃的 反向运动 Plyometrics公司 数学 物理医学与康复 统计 医学 物理 生理学 量子力学
作者
Jiaqing Xu,Anthony N. Turner,Paul Comfort,John R. Harry,John J. McMahon,Shyam Chavda,Chris Bishop
出处
期刊:Sports Medicine [Springer Science+Business Media]
卷期号:53 (5): 1055-1072 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1007/s40279-023-01828-x
摘要

The heights obtained during the countermovement jump and drop jump tests have been measured by numerous studies using different calculation methods and pieces of equipment. However, the differences in calculation methods and equipment used have resulted in discrepancies in jump height being reported.The aim of this systematic review was to examine the available literature pertaining to the different calculation methods to estimate the jump height during the countermovement jump and drop jump.A systematic review of the literature was undertaken using the SPORTDiscus, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PubMed electronic databases, with all articles required to meet specified criteria based on a quality scoring system.Twenty-one articles met the inclusion criteria, relating various calculation methods and equipment employed when measuring jump height in either of these two tests. The flight time and jump-and-reach methods provide practitioners with jump height data in the shortest time, but their accuracy is affected by factors such as participant conditions or equipment sensitivity. The motion capture systems and the double integration method measure the jump height from the centre of mass height at the initial flat foot standing to the apex of jumping, where the centre of mass displacement generated by the ankle plantarflexion is known. The impulse-momentum and flight time methods could only measure the jump height from the centre of mass height at the instant of take-off to the apex of jumping, thus, providing statistically significantly lower jump height values compared with the former two methods. However, further research is warranted to investigate the reliability of each calculation method when using different equipment settings.Our findings indicate that using the impulse-momentum method via a force platform is the most appropriate way for the jump height from the instant of take-off to the apex of jumping to be measured. Alternatively, the double integration method via a force platform is preferred to quantify the jump height from the initial flat foot standing to the apex of jumping.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Singularity完成签到,获得积分0
1秒前
JamesPei应助zq采纳,获得10
2秒前
所所应助韭黄采纳,获得10
6秒前
江霭完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
鲤鱼青槐完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
22秒前
缥缈的冰旋完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
28秒前
29秒前
ailemonmint完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
30秒前
玉ER完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
32秒前
四十四次日落完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
科研通AI2S应助羊二呆采纳,获得10
32秒前
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
35秒前
水晶茶杯发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
欢欢完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
茯苓完成签到 ,获得积分10
39秒前
小鱼发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
香香丿完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
41秒前
万能图书馆应助zz123采纳,获得10
41秒前
杜康完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
Cheung2121发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
医学小王完成签到 ,获得积分10
42秒前
44秒前
刘涵完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
帅气的沧海完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
辣辣辣辣辣辣完成签到 ,获得积分10
49秒前
50秒前
53秒前
乐观半兰完成签到,获得积分10
55秒前
55秒前
小丸子和zz完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
57秒前
江雁完成签到,获得积分10
57秒前
坚定芯完成签到,获得积分10
57秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038112
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3575788
关于积分的说明 11373801
捐赠科研通 3305604
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819255
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892655
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815022