Quantifying Withdrawal of Consent, Loss to Follow-Up, Early Drug Discontinuation, and Censoring in Oncology Trials

审查(临床试验) 医学 中止 内科学 逻辑回归 临床试验 置信区间 标准误差 肿瘤科 统计 病理 数学
作者
Brooke E. Wilson,Michelle B. Nadler,Alexandra Desnoyers,Eitan Amir
出处
期刊:Journal of The National Comprehensive Cancer Network 卷期号:19 (12): 1433-1440 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2021.7015
摘要

Background: Censoring due to early drug discontinuation (EDD) or withdrawal of consent or loss to follow-up (WCLFU) can result in postrandomization bias. In oncology, censoring rules vary with no defined standards. In this study, we sought to describe the planned handling and transparency of censoring data in oncology trials supporting FDA approval and to compare EDD and WCLFU in experimental and control arms. Methods: We searched FDA archives to identify solid tumor drug approvals and their associated trials between 2015 and 2019, and extracted the planned handling and reporting of censored data. We compared the proportion of WCLFU and EDD between the experimental and control arms by using generalized estimating equations, and performed logistic regression to identify trial characteristics associated with WCLFU occurring more frequently in the control group. Results: Censoring rules were defined adequately in 48 (59%) of 81 included studies. Only 14 (17%) reported proportions of censored participants clearly. The proportion of WCLFU was higher in the control group than in the experimental group (mean, 3.9% vs 2.5%; β-coefficient, −2.2; 95% CI, −3.1 to −1.3; P <.001). EDD was numerically higher in the experimental arm in 61% of studies, but there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of EDD between the experimental and control groups (mean, 21.6% vs 19.9%, respectively; β-coefficient, 0.27; 95% CI, −0.32 to 0.87; P =.37). The proportion of EDD due to adverse effects (AEs) was higher in the experimental group (mean, 13.2% vs 8.5%; β-coefficient, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.57–2.45; P =.002). WCLFU was higher in the control group in studies with an active control group (odds ratio [OR], 10.1; P <.001) and in open label studies (OR, 3.00; P =.08). Conclusions: There are significant differences in WCLFU and EDD for AEs between the experimental and control arms in oncology trials. This may introduce postrandomization bias. Trials should improve the reporting and handling of censored data so that clinicians and patients are fully informed regarding the expected benefits of a treatment.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
caigou完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
ll发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Shark发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
元谷雪发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
金福珠发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
qiii发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Wind应助ichia采纳,获得10
5秒前
yu完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
5秒前
赘婿应助饱满凡灵采纳,获得30
5秒前
李耀京完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
蚝油盗梨发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
yu发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助coco采纳,获得10
9秒前
活泼红牛完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
yl发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
英勇善愁完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
田様应助别闹闹采纳,获得10
11秒前
CipherSage应助斯文可仁采纳,获得10
11秒前
羽翼发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
方旋发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
zhou完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
厚朴发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
无极微光应助知之采纳,获得20
14秒前
蜜桃乌龙茶完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
千世kk发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
小灰灰完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
李旭涵发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
流云完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
九宝完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
柯语雪完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
杏里发布了新的文献求助50
17秒前
哦萨尔完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
高分求助中
2025-2031全球及中国金刚石触媒粉行业研究及十五五规划分析报告 12000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1000
The Composition and Relative Chronology of Dynasties 16 and 17 in Egypt 1000
Russian Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity 800
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 800
Translanguaging in Action in English-Medium Classrooms: A Resource Book for Teachers 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5695186
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5100843
关于积分的说明 15215623
捐赠科研通 4851627
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2602586
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1554228
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1512233