Quantifying Withdrawal of Consent, Loss to Follow-Up, Early Drug Discontinuation, and Censoring in Oncology Trials

审查(临床试验) 医学 中止 内科学 逻辑回归 临床试验 置信区间 标准误差 肿瘤科 统计 病理 数学
作者
Brooke E. Wilson,Michelle B. Nadler,Alexandra Desnoyers,Eitan Amir
出处
期刊:Journal of The National Comprehensive Cancer Network 卷期号:19 (12): 1433-1440 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2021.7015
摘要

Censoring due to early drug discontinuation (EDD) or withdrawal of consent or loss to follow-up (WCLFU) can result in postrandomization bias. In oncology, censoring rules vary with no defined standards. In this study, we sought to describe the planned handling and transparency of censoring data in oncology trials supporting FDA approval and to compare EDD and WCLFU in experimental and control arms.We searched FDA archives to identify solid tumor drug approvals and their associated trials between 2015 and 2019, and extracted the planned handling and reporting of censored data. We compared the proportion of WCLFU and EDD between the experimental and control arms by using generalized estimating equations, and performed logistic regression to identify trial characteristics associated with WCLFU occurring more frequently in the control group.Censoring rules were defined adequately in 48 (59%) of 81 included studies. Only 14 (17%) reported proportions of censored participants clearly. The proportion of WCLFU was higher in the control group than in the experimental group (mean, 3.9% vs 2.5%; β-coefficient, -2.2; 95% CI, -3.1 to -1.3; P<.001). EDD was numerically higher in the experimental arm in 61% of studies, but there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of EDD between the experimental and control groups (mean, 21.6% vs 19.9%, respectively; β-coefficient, 0.27; 95% CI, -0.32 to 0.87; P=.37). The proportion of EDD due to adverse effects (AEs) was higher in the experimental group (mean, 13.2% vs 8.5%; β-coefficient, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.57-2.45; P=.002). WCLFU was higher in the control group in studies with an active control group (odds ratio [OR], 10.1; P<.001) and in open label studies (OR, 3.00; P=.08).There are significant differences in WCLFU and EDD for AEs between the experimental and control arms in oncology trials. This may introduce postrandomization bias. Trials should improve the reporting and handling of censored data so that clinicians and patients are fully informed regarding the expected benefits of a treatment.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
AaaDaisy发布了新的文献求助20
1秒前
傲娇半山完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
浅尝离白应助夕陵采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
贰鸟应助鸭鸭鸭作坊采纳,获得20
4秒前
4秒前
不许放羊关注了科研通微信公众号
4秒前
5秒前
gb发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
轩辕疾完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
1234发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
JamesPei应助自觉的歌曲采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
alchemist完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
清爽外套完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
于小野发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
LMH发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
椰子熟了耶完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
tuo zhang发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
落寞语薇发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
yuaaaann完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
大个应助隐形的长颈鹿采纳,获得10
16秒前
成诗怡发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
哈哈哈完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
自觉的歌曲完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
我是老大应助杏林靴子采纳,获得10
19秒前
earth完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
罗小小发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
小步快跑完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
UncYoung完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
CodeCraft应助健忘天问采纳,获得10
22秒前
脑洞疼应助你hao采纳,获得10
22秒前
香蕉觅云应助二号采纳,获得10
23秒前
沐晴完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Foreign Policy of the French Second Empire: A Bibliography 500
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3146253
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2797588
关于积分的说明 7824904
捐赠科研通 2453986
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1305944
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 627623
版权声明 601503