已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Quantifying Withdrawal of Consent, Loss to Follow-Up, Early Drug Discontinuation, and Censoring in Oncology Trials

审查(临床试验) 医学 中止 内科学 逻辑回归 临床试验 置信区间 标准误差 肿瘤科 统计 病理 数学
作者
Brooke E. Wilson,Michelle B. Nadler,Alexandra Desnoyers,Eitan Amir
出处
期刊:Journal of The National Comprehensive Cancer Network 卷期号:19 (12): 1433-1440 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2021.7015
摘要

Background: Censoring due to early drug discontinuation (EDD) or withdrawal of consent or loss to follow-up (WCLFU) can result in postrandomization bias. In oncology, censoring rules vary with no defined standards. In this study, we sought to describe the planned handling and transparency of censoring data in oncology trials supporting FDA approval and to compare EDD and WCLFU in experimental and control arms. Methods: We searched FDA archives to identify solid tumor drug approvals and their associated trials between 2015 and 2019, and extracted the planned handling and reporting of censored data. We compared the proportion of WCLFU and EDD between the experimental and control arms by using generalized estimating equations, and performed logistic regression to identify trial characteristics associated with WCLFU occurring more frequently in the control group. Results: Censoring rules were defined adequately in 48 (59%) of 81 included studies. Only 14 (17%) reported proportions of censored participants clearly. The proportion of WCLFU was higher in the control group than in the experimental group (mean, 3.9% vs 2.5%; β-coefficient, −2.2; 95% CI, −3.1 to −1.3; P <.001). EDD was numerically higher in the experimental arm in 61% of studies, but there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of EDD between the experimental and control groups (mean, 21.6% vs 19.9%, respectively; β-coefficient, 0.27; 95% CI, −0.32 to 0.87; P =.37). The proportion of EDD due to adverse effects (AEs) was higher in the experimental group (mean, 13.2% vs 8.5%; β-coefficient, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.57–2.45; P =.002). WCLFU was higher in the control group in studies with an active control group (odds ratio [OR], 10.1; P <.001) and in open label studies (OR, 3.00; P =.08). Conclusions: There are significant differences in WCLFU and EDD for AEs between the experimental and control arms in oncology trials. This may introduce postrandomization bias. Trials should improve the reporting and handling of censored data so that clinicians and patients are fully informed regarding the expected benefits of a treatment.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
PAD发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
赘婿应助清澈水眸采纳,获得10
4秒前
偷得浮生半日闲完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
哲别发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
19秒前
令宏发布了新的文献求助30
22秒前
YHJX完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
Longlong应助哲别采纳,获得30
25秒前
郭燥发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
狗妹那塞完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
32秒前
哒哒发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
繁笙完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
闫伯涵完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
xiaojian_291发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
tRNA完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
41秒前
科研dog完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
大个应助哒哒采纳,获得10
41秒前
42秒前
医学帅哥完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
47秒前
听曲散步完成签到,获得积分10
47秒前
Fern完成签到 ,获得积分10
49秒前
丘比特应助谨慎从露采纳,获得10
50秒前
狂野忆文完成签到,获得积分10
50秒前
丘比特应助Charley采纳,获得10
52秒前
52秒前
迷人兰花完成签到,获得积分10
54秒前
1分钟前
小傻瓜要多学习完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
谨慎从露完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
1分钟前
谨慎从露发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Charley发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
淡定的健柏完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
NexusExplorer应助Jello采纳,获得10
1分钟前
高分求助中
Ophthalmic Equipment Market by Devices(surgical: vitreorentinal,IOLs,OVDs,contact lens,RGP lens,backflush,diagnostic&monitoring:OCT,actorefractor,keratometer,tonometer,ophthalmoscpe,OVD), End User,Buying Criteria-Global Forecast to2029 2000
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Technical Brochure TB 814: LPIT applications in HV gas insulated switchgear 1000
Immigrant Incorporation in East Asian Democracies 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3965493
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3510811
关于积分的说明 11155140
捐赠科研通 3245287
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1792783
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 874096
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 804176