亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies

医学 血压 冲程(发动机) 心肌梗塞 安慰剂 内科学 随机对照试验 荟萃分析 临床试验 相对风险 重症监护医学 背景(考古学) 物理疗法 置信区间 替代医学 病理 机械工程 生物 工程类 古生物学
作者
M R Law,Joan K. Morris,Nicholas Wald
出处
期刊:BMJ [BMJ]
卷期号:338 (may19 1): b1665-b1665 被引量:2679
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmj.b1665
摘要

Objectives To determine the quantitative efficacy of different classes of blood pressure lowering drugs in preventing coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke, and who should receive treatment. Design Meta-analysis. Data source Medline (1966-2007). Study selection Randomised trials of blood pressure lowering drugs recording CHD events and strokes. 108 trials studied differences in blood pressure between study drug and placebo (or control group not receiving the study drug) ("blood pressure difference trials"), and 46 trials compared drugs ("drug comparison trials"). Seven trials with three randomised groups fell into both categories. The results were interpreted in the context of those expected from the largest published meta-analysis of cohort studies, totalling 958 000 people. Participants 464 000 people defined into three mutually exclusive categories: participants with no history of vascular disease, a history of CHD, or a history of stroke. Results In the blood pressure difference trials β blockers had a special effect over and above that due to blood pressure reduction in preventing recurrent CHD events in people with a history of CHD: risk reduction 29% (95% confidence interval 22% to 34%) compared with 15% (11% to 19%) in trials of other drugs. The extra effect was limited to a few years after myocardial infarction, with a risk reduction of 31% compared with 13% in people with CHD with no recent infarct (P=0.04). In the other blood pressure difference trials (excluding CHD events in trials of β blockers in people with CHD), there was a 22% reduction in CHD events (17% to 27%) and a 41% (33% to 48%) reduction in stroke for a blood pressure reduction of 10 mm Hg systolic or 5 mm Hg diastolic, similar to the reductions of 25% (CHD) and 36% (stroke) expected for the same difference in blood pressure from the cohort study meta-analysis, indicating that the benefit is explained by blood pressure reduction itself. The five main classes of blood pressure lowering drugs (thiazides, β blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and calcium channel blockers) were similarly effective (within a few percentage points) in preventing CHD events and strokes, with the exception that calcium channel blockers had a greater preventive effect on stroke (relative risk 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 0.98). The percentage reductions in CHD events and stroke were similar in people with and without cardiovascular disease and regardless of blood pressure before treatment (down to 110 mm Hg systolic and 70 mm Hg diastolic). Combining our results with those from two other studies (the meta-analyses of blood pressure cohort studies and of trials determining the blood pressure lowering effects of drugs according to dose) showed that in people aged 60-69 with a diastolic blood pressure before treatment of 90 mm Hg, three drugs at half standard dose in combination reduced the risk of CHD by an estimated 46% and of stroke by 62%; one drug at standard dose had about half this effect. The present meta-analysis also showed that drugs other than calcium channel blockers (with the exception of non-cardioselective β blockers) reduced the incidence of heart failure by 24% (19% to 28%) and calcium channel blockers by 19% (6% to 31%). Conclusions With the exception of the extra protective effect of β blockers given shortly after a myocardial infarction and the minor additional effect of calcium channel blockers in preventing stroke, all the classes of blood pressure lowering drugs have a similar effect in reducing CHD events and stroke for a given reduction in blood pressure so excluding material pleiotropic effects. The proportional reduction in cardiovascular disease events was the same or similar regardless of pretreatment blood pressure and the presence or absence of existing cardiovascular disease. Guidelines on the use of blood pressure lowering drugs can be simplified so that drugs are offered to people with all levels of blood pressure. Our results indicate the importance of lowering blood pressure in everyone over a certain age, rather than measuring it in everyone and treating it in some.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
2秒前
共享精神应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
番茄大王发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
11秒前
xiaofan1991发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
xiaofan1991完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
25秒前
32秒前
36秒前
阿司匹林发布了新的文献求助30
36秒前
静坐听雨萧完成签到 ,获得积分10
39秒前
番茄大王完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
阿司匹林完成签到,获得积分10
47秒前
1分钟前
1分钟前
Omni发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
漂亮夏兰发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
2分钟前
Darcy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
英姑应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
jcz完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
大模型应助F光采纳,获得30
2分钟前
2分钟前
F光发布了新的文献求助30
2分钟前
2分钟前
whatever应助F光采纳,获得20
2分钟前
F光完成签到,获得积分20
3分钟前
安青兰完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
沉静的安青完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
MissGrrrace完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
xiaoxinbaba发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
风轻云淡发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
Darcy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Propeller Design 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6012704
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7572611
关于积分的说明 16139311
捐赠科研通 5159757
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2763175
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1742564
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1634090