狼牙棒
医学
胸痛
心肌梗塞
急诊科
内科学
肌钙蛋白
心脏病学
危险分层
风险评估
心肌梗死诊断
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
计算机安全
计算机科学
精神科
作者
Connor M. O’Rielly,Tyrone G. Harrison,James E. Andruchow,Paul E. Ronksley,Tolulope T. Sajobi,Helen Robertson,Diane Lorenzetti,Andrew D. McRae
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cjca.2022.12.028
摘要
BackgroundChest pain is a common cause for emergency department (ED) presentations. After myocardial infarction (MI) has been ruled out by means of electrocardiography and troponin testing, decisions around anatomic or functional testing may be informed by clinical risk scores. We conducted a systematic review to synthesize evidence of the prognostic performance of chest pain risk scores among ED patients who have had MI ruled out by means of a high-sensitivity troponin assay.MethodsWe queried multiple databases from inception to May 17, 2022. We included studies that quantified risk of 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), at different cutoffs of clinical risk scores, among adult patients who had MI ruled out by means of a high-sensitivity troponin assay. Prognostic performance of each score was synthesized and described, but meta-analysis was not possible.ResultsSix studies met inclusion criteria. Short-term MACE risk among patients who had MI ruled out by means of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays was very low. The HEART score, with a cutoff of 3 or less, predicted a very low risk of MACE among the greatest proportion of patients. Other scores had lower sensitivity or classified fewer patients as low risk.ConclusionsThe HEART score with a cutoff value of 3 or less accurately identified the greatest number of patients at low risk of 30-day MACE. However, MACE risk among patients who have MI ruled out by means of high-sensitivity troponin testing is sufficiently low that clinical risk stratification or noninvasive testing may be of little additional value in identifying patients with coronary disease.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI