医学
肺栓塞
内科学
接收机工作特性
弗雷明翰风险评分
曲线下面积
临床终点
人口
临床试验
疾病
环境卫生
作者
Yuta Tsujisaka,Yugo Yamashita,Takeshi Morimoto,Toru Takase,Seiichi Hiramori,Kitae Kim,Maki Oi,Masaharu Akao,Yohei Kobayashi,Po‐Min Chen,Katsuyuki Murata,Yoshiaki Tsuyuki,Yuji Nishimoto,Jiro Sakamoto,Kiyonori Togi,Hiroshi Mikami,Kensuke Takabayashi,Takao Kato,Koh Ono,Takeshi Kimura
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2023.10.015
摘要
Background The RIETE score could be specifically useful for identification of low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) patients for home treatment. However, the external validation of the RIETE score has been limited. Methods The COMMAND VTE Registry is a multicenter registry enrolling consecutive patients with acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE). The current study population consisted of 1479 patients with acute PE, who were divided into 2 groups; RIETE scores of 0 (N = 260) and ≥ 1 (N = 1219). Results The cumulative 10-day and 30-day incidences of a composite endpoint of all-cause death, recurrent PE, or major bleeding were lower in patients with the RIETE score of 0 than in those with the RIETE score of ≥1 (10-day: 0.4 % vs. 6.7 %, P < 0.001, and 30-day: 0.4 % vs. 10.0 %, P < 0.001). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the RIETE score for the 10-day composite endpoint showed numerically better predictive ability than that in the sPESI score (0.77 vs. 0.73, P = 0.07), and the AUC in the RIETE score for the 30-day composite endpoint showed significantly better predictive ability than that in the sPESI score (0.77 vs. 0.71, P = 0.003). Conclusions The RIETE score was well validated in the current large real-world registry. The RIETE score of 0 could identify patients with reasonably low risks of the 10-day and 30-day composite endpoint of all-cause death, recurrent PE, or major bleeding.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI