Ethical risks in robot health education: A qualitative study

定性研究 尊严 工程伦理学 背景(考古学) 医疗保健 心理学 研究伦理 护理部 医学教育 医学 社会学 政治学 工程类 社会科学 古生物学 精神科 法学 生物
作者
ZiQi Mei,Shengji Jin,Wei-tong Li,S. Zhang,XiRong Cheng,Yiting Li,Meng Wang,YuLei Song,Wenjing Tu,Haiyan Yin,Qing Wang,Yamei Bai,Guihua Xu
出处
期刊:Nursing Ethics [SAGE Publishing]
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1177/09697330241270829
摘要

Background As health education robots may potentially become a significant support force in nursing practice in the future, it is imperative to adhere to the European Union’s concept of “Responsible Research and Innovation” (RRI) and deeply reflect on the ethical risks hidden in the process of intelligent robotic health education. Aim This study explores the perceptions of professional nursing professionals regarding the potential ethical risks associated with the clinical practice of intelligent robotic health education. Research design This study adopts a descriptive phenomenological approach, employing Colaizzi’s seven-step method for data analysis. Participants and research context We conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 nursing professionals from tertiary comprehensive hospitals in China. Ethical considerations This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Provincial Second Chinese Medicine Hospital. Findings Nursing personnel, adhering to the principles of RRI and the concept of “person-centered” care, have critically reflected on the potential ethical risks inherent in robotic health education. This reflection has primarily identified six themes: (a) threats to human dignity, (b) concerns about patient safety, (c) apprehensions about privacy disclosure, (d) worries about implicit burdens, (e) concerns about responsibility attribution, and (f) expectations for social support. Conclusions This study focuses on health education robots, which are perceived to have minimal ethical risks, and provides rich and detailed insights into the ethical risks associated with robotic health education. Even seemingly safe health education robots elicit significant concerns among professionals regarding their safety and ethics in clinical practice. As we move forward, it is essential to remain attentive to the potential negative impacts of robots and actively address them.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
HMF发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
科目三应助Geng采纳,获得10
刚刚
Labor2025完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
小崔加油完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
林少玮发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
科研通AI5应助newfat采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
香蕉觅云应助可靠的寒风采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
烟花应助燕不留声采纳,获得10
3秒前
吴淼发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
cdercder应助长医德莱文采纳,获得20
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
woshiwuziq发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
你柿不柿莓柿完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
离夜发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
EdwardKING发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
李乐完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
7秒前
运敬完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
科研通AI2S应助十一采纳,获得10
7秒前
肉肉发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
漂亮夏兰完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
所所应助猪猪hero采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
又晴发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
zwk发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
淡定发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
plutosmall发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
sora98完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
All the Birds of the World 4000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 3000
Musculoskeletal Pain - Market Insight, Epidemiology And Market Forecast - 2034 2000
Animal Physiology 2000
Am Rande der Geschichte : mein Leben in China / Ruth Weiss 1500
CENTRAL BOOKS: A BRIEF HISTORY 1939 TO 1999 by Dave Cope 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3747963
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3290830
关于积分的说明 10071227
捐赠科研通 3006723
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1651273
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 786287
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 751630