Occlusal Contact Surface Changes and Occlusal Force Distribution Between Vacuum-Formed Retainers and Other Retainers: A Systematic Review

The present systematic review was done to assess the available literatures on changes in the number of occlusal contacts (NOC), occlusal contact surface areas, and occlusal force distribution (OFD) with vacuumformed retainers (VFRs) or clear overlay retainers during retention and to compare them with other retainers.Six electronic databases (Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Lilacs, and Google Scholar) were searched.Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) reporting on occlusal contact changes with VFRs were included.A total of nine articles were included in this review: three RCTs, five prospective controlled trials (PCTs), and one CCT.The Cochrane risk of bias tool and ROBINS-I tool were used for risk of bias assessment.The three RCTs showed moderate risk of bias, and out of five CCTs, four showed low risk of bias, and one showed moderate risk of bias.One CCT showed a low risk of bias in the ROBINS-I tool.Two out of four studies reported improved occlusal surface area (OSA) with VFRs when assessed at the end of six months and 12 months; one out of four studies reported improved NOC; and one study reported a decrease in OFD anteriorly and an increase in OFD posteriorly after two months of retention.On comparison between the groups, the other retainer groups showed more NOCs compared to VFRs.The limited available evidence suggests an increase in OSA and no change in NOCs and OFD with VFRs during retention.No significant differences between VFRs and other retainers for OSA and OFD were noted, and more NOCs were noted for other retainer groups.