Impact of revised International Staging System 2 risk stratification on outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma receiving autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Kamal Alzahrani,Oren Pasvolsky,Zhongya Wang,Denái R. Milton,Mark R. Tanner,Qaiser Bashir,Samer A. Srour,Neeraj Saini,Paul Lin,Jeremy Ramdial,Yago Nieto,Hans C. Lee,Krina K. Patel,Elisabet E. Manasanch,Partow Kebriaei,Sheeba K. Thomas,Donna M. Weber,Robert Z. Orlowski,Elizabeth J. Shpall,Richard E. Champlin,Muzaffar H. Qazilbash
Summary The second revision of the International Staging System (R2‐ISS) is a simple tool to risk‐stratify newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. Here, we completed a retrospective analysis to evaluate the utility of R2‐ISS in NDMM patients who underwent up‐front autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto‐HCT). A total of 1291 patients were included, with a median age of 62 years (range 29–83). The distribution of R2‐ISS stages was: 123 (10%) stage I, 471 (36%) stage II, 566 (44%) stage III and 131 (10%) stage IV. With a median follow‐up of 42.2 months (range 0.3–181.0), the median PFS was 73.0, 65.2, 44.0 and 24.8 months, ( p < 0.001) and the median OS was 130.8, 128.5, 94.2 and 61.4 months ( p < 0.001) for patients with R2‐ISS stages I, II, III and IV respectively. On multivariable analysis (MVA) for PFS, using R2‐ISS stage I as reference, R2‐ISS stages III (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.55 [1.05–2.29]; p = 0.028) and IV (2.04 [1.24–3.36]; p = 0.005) were associated with significantly inferior PFS. In the MVA of OS, using R2‐ISS stage I as reference, only R2‐ISS stage IV was associated with significantly inferior OS (2.43 [1.18–5.01]; p = 0.017). Overall, we found that R2‐ISS is a reliable prognostic tool for NDMM patients undergoing up‐front auto‐HCT.