Belimumab in kidney transplantation – Authors' reply

医学 肾移植 贝里穆马布 移植 重症监护医学 内科学 免疫学 抗体 B细胞激活因子 B细胞
作者
Gemma D. Banham,Shaun Flint,Don N Shanahan,Robert B. Henderson,Menna R. Clatworthy
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:393 (10174): 875-876 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)33066-6
摘要

We thank Ekaterini Christina Tampaki and colleagues for their interest in our study1Banham GD Flint SM Torpey N et al.Belimumab in kidney transplantation: an experimental medicine, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial.Lancet. 2018; 391: 2619-2630Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (68) Google Scholar and in potential interracial differences in the response to belimumab in renal transplant recipients. As shown in Table 1,1Banham GD Flint SM Torpey N et al.Belimumab in kidney transplantation: an experimental medicine, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial.Lancet. 2018; 391: 2619-2630Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (68) Google Scholar each treatment group had only one non-white participant. Subgroup analysis of outcomes between white and non-white participants was therefore neither appropriate nor feasible. We agree that long-term follow-up data are important. We reported rigorous follow-up data on adverse events (including infection, cancer, and suicide or self-harm events) for 1-year post-transplant and 6 months after cessation of belimumab. These data represent a reasonable follow-up period for a phase 2 study in this field and showed no safety issues. As with any patient on long-term immunosuppression, these renal transplant recipients will continue to have regular, careful, long-term follow-up of outcomes by their local clinicians. Notably, this phase 2 study was not designed to investigate long-term outcomes, but rather to provide proof of potential efficacy and the exclusion of a major early safety signal. Further studies using a larger cohort will be required to provide long-term efficacy and safety data in kidney transplant recipients. With regards to the use of the mixed model for repeated measures, this approach has been used in many clinical trials2Dungan KM Povedano ST Forst T et al.Once-weekly dulaglutide versus once-daily liraglutide in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-6): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.Lancet. 2014; 384: 1349-1357Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (362) Google Scholar, 3Kanes S Colquhoun H Gunduz-Bruce H et al.Brexanolone (SAGE-547 injection) in post-partum depression: a randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2017; 390: 480-489Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (228) Google Scholar and was one of the standard analysis strategies available when our study protocol was written. However, we acknowledge that the mixed model for repeated measures has been superseded by the use of multiple imputation techniques. To mitigate the effect of missing data in our study, sensitivity analyses were performed on the primary efficacy data, (eg, per-protocol analysis and non-parametric analysis). Our main conclusions are based on these per-protocol population analyses, including those examining peripheral blood transcriptomics, protein array estimation of IgG, and regulatory B-cell counts. We thank Sakir Ahmed for highlighting the challenges of selecting endpoints that accurately reflect the biological activity of interventions. We chose a reduction in naive B cells as a primary endpoint because of the known importance of B-lymphocyte simulator (BLyS) for naive B-cell survival,4Schiemann B Gommerman JL Vora K et al.An essential role for BAFF in the normal development of B cells through a BCMA-independent pathway.Science. 2001; 293: 2111-2114Crossref PubMed Scopus (901) Google Scholar evidenced by their depletion in previous studies utilising belimumab.5Stohl W Hiepe F Latinis KM et al.Belimumab reduces autoantibodies, normalizes low complement levels, and reduces select B cell populations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.Arthritis Rheum. 2012; 64: 2328-2337Crossref PubMed Scopus (274) Google Scholar When estimating the potential reduction in naive B cells that we might observe in the placebo group, we were aware that renal transplant recipients differ from previous cohorts who have received belimumab, in that they have end-stage renal failure (which is immunosuppressive) and receive substantial additional immunosuppression (triple maintenance therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone, and basiliximab at induction). This consideration led us to do an enabling study on a historical cohort of renal transplant patients receiving the same standard of care as the trial population, to model the predicted effect of belimumab (detailed on p 7 of the appendix1Banham GD Flint SM Torpey N et al.Belimumab in kidney transplantation: an experimental medicine, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial.Lancet. 2018; 391: 2619-2630Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (68) Google Scholar). However, the magnitude of the reduction in naive B cells in the control group was greater than in the enabling cohort, resulting in a failure to reach a significant difference between the placebo and belimumab groups. We agree that one simple measure cannot provide an accurate estimation of the effect of belimumab on the immune system; in fact, a strength of our study was the application of various mechanistic endpoints to more broadly investigate immune responses.6Geissler EK Hutchinson JA Immunological investigations empower transplant drug trials.Lancet. 2018; 391: 2578-2579Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar Furthermore, we agree that understanding the effect of belimumab on potentially tolerogenic regulatory B cells is of upmost importance. We were careful to assay interleukin (IL)-10-producing regulatory B cells in our study, showing that, in all compartments (including transitional B cells), belimumab was associated with an increase in the IL-10 to IL-6 ratio, suggesting a preservation, and even an enhancement, of this important subset. Overall, we did the most intensive interrogation of human immune responses after belimumab use to date, and our findings make a big step in moving our understanding of its action from ignorance to BLyS. GDB was funded by a Wellcome Trust Translational Medicine and Therapeutics PhD grant (102728/z/13/z). SMF received funding from GlaxoSmithKline for a GlaxoSmithKline Wellcome Trust Translational Medicine and Therapeutics PhD. SMF, DNS, and RBH are employees of and hold stock in GlaxoSmithKline. GDB and MRC have received grants from GlaxoSmithKline outside the submitted work. MRC is funded by a Medical Research Council New Investigator Research Grant (MR/N024907/1), and an Arthritis Research UK Cure Challenge Research Grant (21777) and receives support from the National Institute of Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre. RBH has a patent pending (number PB65956). Belimumab in kidney transplantation: an experimental medicine, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trialBelimumab might be a useful adjunct to standard-of-care immunosuppression in renal transplantation, with no major increased risk of infection and potential beneficial effects on humoral alloimmunity. Full-Text PDF Belimumab in kidney transplantationI read with interest the Article by Gemma D Banham and colleagues (June 30, 2018, p 2619).1 Inhibiting B-lymphocyte simulator (BLyS) has been an attractive target for immunomodulation. Belimumab is approved for use in systemic lupus erythematosus in the USA and in Europe, but it has indications restricted to non-life-threatening disease. About 5% of patients with lupus receive belimumab.2 In Banham and colleagues' phase 2 study1 of belimumab for recipients of kidney transplants, naive B-cell depletion from baseline to week 24 was a coprimary endpoint. Full-Text PDF Belimumab in kidney transplantationWe found it particularly interesting how belimumab leads to additional immunosuppression when used in combination with other immunosuppressive drugs.1 However, the use of belimumab as add-on therapy can complicate treatment because it moderately improved the response rate of belimumab in the study population on the basis of a complex endpoint showing uncertain clinical benefits without reducing corticosteroid requirements.1–3 Risk of infections (particularly opportunistic infections) and cancer is poorly documented. Full-Text PDF

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刘冲发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
桐桐应助无忧采纳,获得10
刚刚
王大饿人给王大饿人的求助进行了留言
刚刚
今后应助hh采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
顾矜应助yu采纳,获得10
1秒前
英姑应助月圆夜采纳,获得10
2秒前
Tom完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
中国人不卷中国人完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
熊姣凤完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
勤恳化蛹完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
猪猪应助苏轼采纳,获得10
3秒前
李健应助机智麦片采纳,获得10
4秒前
壮观手套发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
汉堡包应助月落采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
傲娇尔安完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
LinlinWang发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
windli发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
可爱的函函应助回首忆生采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
p二完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
马丁完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
yu完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
allton完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
Lio给Lio的求助进行了留言
9秒前
美满的珠发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
呢款发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
香蕉觅云应助境屾采纳,获得10
10秒前
赘婿应助端庄的冬天采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
斯文败类应助Li采纳,获得10
11秒前
sunflower完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
ddddddd应助tguczf采纳,获得10
11秒前
Yulanda完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
高分求助中
The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 3000
HANDBOOK OF CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 106th edition 1000
ASPEN Adult Nutrition Support Core Curriculum, Fourth Edition 1000
Decentring Leadership 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
脑电大模型与情感脑机接口研究--郑伟龙 500
Genera Orchidacearum Volume 4: Epidendroideae, Part 1 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6288323
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8107013
关于积分的说明 16959088
捐赠科研通 5353385
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2844755
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1821935
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1678122