医学
科克伦图书馆
荟萃分析
失眠症
随机对照试验
相对风险
梅德林
不利影响
置信区间
科学网
内科学
传统医学
精神科
政治学
法学
作者
Bo-Wei Chen,Jing Yi,Bei Sun,Peng Jia,Wenjiang Zhang,Baiyan Liu
出处
期刊:Medicine
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2020-02-01
卷期号:99 (6): e19033-e19033
被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1097/md.0000000000019033
摘要
Zaoren Anshen capsules (ZRAS) have been widely used to treat patients with insomnia. However, the efficacy and safety of ZRAS for insomnia treatment is not entirely clear. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the effect of ZRAS for the treatment of insomnia by a systematic meta-analysis.We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WanFang databases and performed a manual search to retrieve relevant articles (available through January 2019) describing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ZRAS for the treatment of insomnia. The quality of the selected articles was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. A meta-analysis of the selected articles was performed with RevMan 5.3 software.A total of 13 articles including 1175 patients were included in the study. Overall, our results showed that ZRAS was slightly higher than that of the conventional Western medicine for insomnia in terms of clinical efficacy rate; but there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups (relative risk [RR] = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.97, 1.09], P = .34). However, it should be noted that ZRAS treatment causes far fewer adverse reaction than treatment with conventional Western medicine (RR = 0.20, 95% CI = [0.14, 0.28], P < .00001).Our results suggested that ZRAS is an effective and safe treatment for insomnia, especially in adverse reaction. However, multi-regional and well-designed RCTs studies are needed in the future to validate the results.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI