医学
结肠镜检查
胃肠病学
PEG比率
内科学
膨胀
随机对照试验
腺瘤
腹痛
结直肠癌
财务
癌症
经济
作者
Yu Bai,Jun Fang,Shengbing Zhao,Dong Wang,Yanqing Li,Ruihua Shi,Ziqin Sun,Mingjun Sun,Feng Ji,Jianmin Si,Zhao‐Shen Li
出处
期刊:Endoscopy
[Georg Thieme Verlag KG]
日期:2017-10-06
被引量:52
标识
DOI:10.1055/s-0043-119213
摘要
Abstract Background and study aims Ideal bowel preparation for colonoscopy requires complete removal of fluid and foam from the colon. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is widely used for bowel preparation, with antifoaming agents such as simethicone commonly used in combination with PEG. Data on the effect of simethicone on the adenoma detection rate (ADR) were limited. This study therefore aimed to investigate whether preprocedure simethicone could increase the ADR. Patients and methods This was a prospective, multicenter, endoscopist-blinded randomized controlled trial involving consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy in six centers in China. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: PEG plus simethicone or PEG alone. The primary outcome was ADR; secondary outcomes were quality of bowel preparation, measured by the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) and bubble scores. Results 583 patients were included. More adenomas were detected in the PEG plus simethicone group than in the PEG alone group (ADR 21.0 % vs. 14.3 %, P = 0.04; advanced ADR 9.0 % vs. 7.0 %, P = 0.38). The mean number of adenomas detected was 2.20 ± 1.36 vs. 1.63 ± 0.89 (P = 0.02). Patients in the PEG plus simethicone group showed better bowel cleansing efficacy: BBPS ≥ 6 in 88.3 % vs. 75.2 % (P < 0.001) and bubble scores of 1.00 ± 1.26 vs. 3.98 ± 2.50 (P < 0.001). Abdominal bloating was reported less frequently in the PEG plus simethicone group (7.8 % vs. 19.7 %, P < 0.001) than in the PEG alone group. Conclusion Combined use of PEG and simethicone is associated with a significantly increased ADR in a Chinese population. Clinical trials registration number: NCT02540239
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI