活性成分
氢氯噻嗪
稳健性(进化)
风险分析(工程)
计算机科学
计量经济学
毒理
数学
医学
药理学
化学
生物
生物化学
放射科
血压
基因
作者
Claudia Sehner,Tanja Bernier,K. Blum,Nicole Clemann,Milica Glogovac,W. Anthony Hawkins,Martín Kohan,Fenneke Linker,Ester Lovsin-Barle,Osahon Osadolor,Thomas D. Pfister,Elisa Schulze,Markus Schwind,Gregor Tuschl,Lisa Wiesner
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105649
摘要
Permitted Daily Exposure Limits (PDEs) are set for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) to control cross-contamination when manufacturing medicinal products in shared facilities. With the lack of official PDE lists for pharmaceuticals, PDEs have to be set by each company separately. Although general rules and guidelines for the setting of PDEs exist, inter-company variations in the setting of PDE occur and are considered acceptable within a certain range. To evaluate the robustness of the PDE approach between different pharmaceutical companies, data on PDE setting of five marketed APIs (amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, metformin, morphine, and omeprazole) were collected and compared. Findings show that the variability between PDE values is within acceptable ranges (below 10-fold) for all compounds, with the highest difference for morphine due to different Point of Departures (PODs) and Adjustment Factors (AFs). Factors of PDE variability identified and further discussed are: (1) availability of data, (2) selection of POD, (3) assignment of AFs, (4) route-to-route extrapolation, and (5) expert judgement and differences in company policies. We conclude that the investigated PDE methods and calculations are robust and scientifically defensible. Additionally, we provide further recommendations to harmonise PDE calculation approaches across the pharmaceutical industry.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI