🔥 科研通第二届『应助活动周』正在进行中,3月24-30日求助秒级响应🚀,千元现金等你拿。当前排名🏆 📚 中科院2025期刊分区📊 已更新

Comparing subjective quality of recovery between remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia for surgical procedures: a meta-analysis

医学 异丙酚 置信区间 荟萃分析 麻醉 Pacu公司 随机对照试验 相对风险 梅德林 外科 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Kuo-Chuan Hung,Wei‐Ting Wang,Weicheng Liu,Chih‐Wei Hsu,Yen‐Ta Huang,Jheng‐Yan Wu,I‐Wen Chen
出处
期刊:Systematic Reviews [BioMed Central]
卷期号:13 (1)
标识
DOI:10.1186/s13643-024-02660-8
摘要

Abstract Background Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine that has been recently introduced as an alternative to propofol for general anesthesia. While both agents have been compared in terms of safety and efficacy, their relative effects on postoperative quality of recovery (QoR) remain unclear. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol on subjective QoR in surgical patients who underwent general anesthesia. Methods Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to May 28, 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials comparing remimazolam and propofol in terms of postoperative QoR. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2) was used to assess study quality. QoR score on postoperative day (POD) 1 (primary outcome), QoR scores on PODs 2–3, QoR dimensions, time to loss of consciousness, other recovery characteristics, and rescue analgesia requirement were evaluated using random-effects meta-analyses. Results This meta-analysis included 13 studies published between 2022 and 2024 involving 1,418 patients. QoR was evaluated using either the QoR-15 (10 studies) or QoR-40 (3 studies) questionnaire. The pooled results indicated no significant difference in the QoR scores on POD 1 (standardized mean difference: 0.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: − 0.20, 0.23, P = 0.88, I 2 = 73%) and PODs 2–3 between remimazolam and propofol. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in QoR dimensions, length of postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay, and time to extubation as well as in the risks of agitation and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Patients administered remimazolam exhibited slower anesthetic induction (mean difference (MD): 32.27 s) but faster recovery of consciousness (MD: − 1.60 min) than those administered propofol. Moreover, remimazolam was associated with a lower risk of rescue analgesia requirement in the PACU (risk ratio: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.89, P = 0.009, I 2 = 0%) but not in the ward. Conclusion Remimazolam is a potential alternative to propofol for general anesthesia as it offers similar QoR to the latter and has advantages in terms of consciousness recovery and immediate postoperative analgesia requirement.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
应助活动周(3月24-30日)排名
今日排名(3月24日)
1#948 nozero
383
5650
2#891 科研小民工
323
5680
3#778 shinysparrow
348
4300
4#588 SYLH
294
2940
5#383 小透明
175
2080
6#173 xjcy
86
870
7#146 子车茗
71
750
8#144 浦肯野
61
830
9#134 Leon
66
680
10#133 36456657
65
680
11#120 whisper
60
600
12#104 火星上的菲鹰
52
520
13#101 昏睡的蟠桃
41
600
14#98 毛豆
49
490
15#98 zho
49
490
16#93 curtisness
46
470
17#89 灵巧高山
34
550
18#78 哎嘿
38
400
19#74 劲秉
28
460
20#73 tuanheqi
10
630
21#71 史小菜
34
370
22#70 hbsand
34
360
23#66 muxiangrong
30
360
24#64 Catalina_S
32
320
25#58 S77
29
290
26#56 研友_Z30GJ8
27
290
27#54 敬老院1号
4
500
28#54 Leif
27
270
29#52 suibianba
25
270
30#52 QOP
26
260
31#52 实验好难
26
260
32#50 木头马尾
25
250
第1名:50元;第2名:30元;第3名:10元

总排名
1#948 nozero
383
5650
2#891 科研小民工
323
5680
3#778 shinysparrow
348
4300
4#588 SYLH
294
2940
5#383 小透明
175
2080
6#173 xjcy
86
870
7#146 子车茗
71
750
8#144 浦肯野
61
830
9#134 Leon
66
680
10#133 36456657
65
680
11#120 whisper
60
600
12#104 火星上的菲鹰
52
520
13#101 昏睡的蟠桃
41
600
14#98 毛豆
49
490
15#98 zho
49
490
16#93 curtisness
46
470
17#89 灵巧高山
34
550
18#78 哎嘿
38
400
19#74 劲秉
28
460
20#73 tuanheqi
10
630
21#71 史小菜
34
370
22#70 hbsand
34
360
23#66 muxiangrong
30
360
24#64 Catalina_S
32
320
25#58 S77
29
290
26#56 研友_Z30GJ8
27
290
27#54 敬老院1号
4
500
28#54 Leif
27
270
29#52 suibianba
25
270
30#52 QOP
26
260
31#52 实验好难
26
260
32#50 木头马尾
25
250
33#44 Auston_zhong
22
220
34#42 云瑾
21
210
35#42 无敌最俊朗
18
240
36#40 怼怼
20
200
37#40 Lars汉堡
20
200
38#39 贰鸟
19
200
39#38 加菲丰丰
19
190
40#38 xunxunmimi
19
190
41#37 cdercder
14
230
42#36 紫色水晶之恋
18
180
43#36 我是站长才怪
18
180
44#36 体贴凌柏
18
180
45#36 斯文的寒风
18
180
46#36 酷炫的毛巾
18
180
47#34 喜悦成威
17
170
48#32 Yancy
16
160
49#32 开朗的手套
16
160
50#32 CAOHOU
16
160
第1名:500元;第2名:300元;第3名:100元
第4名:50元;第5名:30元;第6-10名:10元

10分钟更新一次,完整排名情况
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
星辰大海应助zismooo采纳,获得20
1秒前
NexusExplorer应助刘刘采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
熊小子爱学习完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
小黑子fanfan完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
酷波er应助小黑子fanfan采纳,获得10
6秒前
锂炸发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
zq完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
我是站长才怪应助蕾蕾子采纳,获得10
8秒前
阳阳阳发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
李健应助壮观以松采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
丘比特应助锂炸采纳,获得10
12秒前
dachengzi发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
深情安青应助小马采纳,获得10
13秒前
冰冰发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
老10完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
lucky完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
wanci应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
兔兔不吐泡泡完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
天天快乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
传奇3应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
kkdsseed应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
思源应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
李爱国应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
酷波er应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
17秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 2000
Conference Record, IAS Annual Meeting 1977 1250
Structural Load Modelling and Combination for Performance and Safety Evaluation 1000
Rethinking Language Education in the Age of Generative AI Edited ByZhongfeng Tian, Chaoran Wang 900
British Girl Chinese Wife (New World Press, 1985) 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3612749
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3184448
关于积分的说明 9605252
捐赠科研通 2890440
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1585649
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 745799
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 727945