医学
肺康复
可比性
德尔菲法
利克特量表
慢性阻塞性肺病
生活质量(医疗保健)
康复
物理疗法
标杆管理
医疗保健
集合(抽象数据类型)
家庭医学
护理部
内科学
心理学
营销
经济
业务
发展心理学
程序设计语言
组合数学
统计
经济增长
计算机科学
数学
作者
Sara Souto-Miranda,Isabel Saraiva,Martijn A. Spruit,Alda Marques
出处
期刊:Thorax
[BMJ]
日期:2023-09-27
卷期号:78 (12): 1240-1247
被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.1136/thorax-2023-220522
摘要
Introduction There is high heterogeneity of outcomes and measures reported in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) trials of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This hinders study comparability and benchmarking of PR. We have developed a core outcome set (COS) to overcome these challenges. Methods This study was informed by a systematic review and two qualitative studies and had patient involvement since its inception. A two-round Delphi survey was available in seven languages. Outcomes (n=63) scored 7–9 (crucial) by ≥70% of the participants and 1–3 (not that important) by ≤15% of participants from both groups in the Likert scale were automatically included in the COS, while outcomes that were considered crucial by only one of the groups were further discussed by the authors in a meeting. Results A total of 299 people (n=229 healthcare professionals/researchers/policy-makers; n=70 people with COPD and informal caregivers) participated in the survey (83% retention), which covered 29 countries/five continents. After the second round, six outcomes were included and three were added in the meeting. The final COS contains dyspnoea, fatigue, functional exercise capacity, health-related quality of life, health behaviours/lifestyle, knowledge about the disease, lower limb muscle function, personal goals and problematic activities of daily living. Conclusion A COS for PR of people with COPD is now available and can be used by different stakeholders to improve consistency and comparability of studies, benchmark PR and improve the quality of care provided. Future research should establish the core measures and investigate the uptake of this COS.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI