Outcomes Following Different Thermal Ablation Strategies in Patients with Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases

医学 烧蚀 倾向得分匹配 热烧蚀 烧蚀区 不利影响 回顾性队列研究 外科 射频消融术 微波消融 导管消融 放射科 内科学
作者
Jianming Li,Guang‐jian Liu,Xiaoyan Xie,Dezhi Zhang,Rongqin Zheng,Hong Yang,Huage Zhong,Guanghai Dai,Jie Yu,Ping Liang
出处
期刊:Radiology [Radiological Society of North America]
卷期号:308 (2) 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1148/radiol.223135
摘要

Background For patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), clinical guidelines recommend imaging-guided thermal ablation combined with systemic therapy. However, the optimal thermal ablation strategy remains unclear. Purpose To compare long-term outcomes between patients who underwent upfront ablation or delayed ablation for unresectable CRLM. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with unresectable CRLM (three or fewer lesions; diameter, <3 cm) admitted to one of seven hospitals between October 2009 and December 2020. Upfront ablation was performed 2-4 weeks before the start of systemic therapy, and delayed ablation was performed 2-3 months after the start of systemic therapy. Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for differences in baseline variables between groups. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary outcome. Overall survival (OS), complications, and adverse events were secondary outcomes. Outcomes were compared between groups by using the log-rank test. Results In total, 255 patients who underwent delayed ablation (mean age, 57 years ± 11 [SD]; 184 men [72%]) and 103 patients who underwent upfront ablation (mean age, 56 years ± 12; 72 men [70%]) were included. After propensity score matching (n = 100 in both groups), the 5-year DFS for patients who underwent upfront ablation was better compared with patients who underwent delayed ablation (36% vs 21%; P = .02). For 5-year OS, no evidence of a difference was observed between ablation strategies (delayed ablation, 59% vs upfront ablation, 64%; P = .49). Additionally, no differences were observed between ablation strategies with respect to the rates of ablative complications (delayed ablation, 6% vs upfront ablation, 5%; P = .76) or drug-related adverse events (delayed and upfront ablation both 9%; P = .99). Conclusion In patients with relatively few (three or fewer) and small (<3 cm) unresectable CRLM, upfront thermal ablation combined with adjuvant systemic therapy led to better DFS compared with delayed ablation. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Georgiades in this issue.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
CBBBB发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助失眠的莫英采纳,获得10
2秒前
Smile完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
辛勤晓蓝完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
爆米花应助FF采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
混子发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Smile发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
10秒前
li发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
清凉茶完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
呼呼哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
meng若完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
Nolan完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
科研混子发布了新的文献求助30
21秒前
寰2023发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
22秒前
24秒前
彭于晏应助李陌陌采纳,获得10
25秒前
李健的小迷弟应助混子采纳,获得10
27秒前
27秒前
桐桐应助健忘傲柏采纳,获得10
30秒前
yaWoooN完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
SciGPT应助cdliuchao采纳,获得10
36秒前
Cheng完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
Tal完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
科目三应助淡然冰之采纳,获得10
37秒前
38秒前
大模型应助Sofia采纳,获得10
39秒前
二酸化炭素CO2完成签到 ,获得积分10
42秒前
秋风暖暖完成签到 ,获得积分0
45秒前
碧蓝的蜻蜓完成签到 ,获得积分10
48秒前
Orange应助3333采纳,获得10
49秒前
金钱柳完成签到,获得积分10
51秒前
高分求助中
Tracking and Data Fusion: A Handbook of Algorithms 1000
Models of Teaching(The 10th Edition,第10版!)《教学模式》(第10版!) 800
La décision juridictionnelle 800
Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie 800
Academic entitlement: Adapting the equity preference questionnaire for a university setting 500
Full waveform acoustic data processing 400
Bounded Meaning 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 免疫学 细胞生物学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2877806
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2491295
关于积分的说明 6743876
捐赠科研通 2172720
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1154626
版权声明 586096
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 566823