Performance of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on Neurosurgery Written Board Examinations

医学 神经外科 梅德林 医学物理学 放射科 政治学 法学
作者
Rohaid Ali,Oliver Y. Tang,Ian D. Connolly,Patricia L. Zadnik Sullivan,John H. Shin,Jared S. Fridley,Wael F. Asaad,Deus Cielo,Adetokunbo A. Oyelese,Curtis E. Doberstein,Ziya L. Gokaslan,Albert E. Telfeian
出处
期刊:Neurosurgery [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
被引量:143
标识
DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000002632
摘要

Interest surrounding generative large language models (LLMs) has rapidly grown. Although ChatGPT (GPT-3.5), a general LLM, has shown near-passing performance on medical student board examinations, the performance of ChatGPT or its successor GPT-4 on specialized examinations and the factors affecting accuracy remain unclear. This study aims to assess the performance of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on a 500-question mock neurosurgical written board examination. The Self-Assessment Neurosurgery Examinations (SANS) American Board of Neurological Surgery Self-Assessment Examination 1 was used to evaluate ChatGPT and GPT-4. Questions were in single best answer, multiple-choice format. χ 2 , Fisher exact, and univariable logistic regression tests were used to assess performance differences in relation to question characteristics. ChatGPT (GPT-3.5) and GPT-4 achieved scores of 73.4% (95% CI: 69.3%-77.2%) and 83.4% (95% CI: 79.8%-86.5%), respectively, relative to the user average of 72.8% (95% CI: 68.6%-76.6%). Both LLMs exceeded last year's passing threshold of 69%. Although scores between ChatGPT and question bank users were equivalent ( P = .963), GPT-4 outperformed both (both P < .001). GPT-4 answered every question answered correctly by ChatGPT and 37.6% (50/133) of remaining incorrect questions correctly. Among 12 question categories, GPT-4 significantly outperformed users in each but performed comparably with ChatGPT in 3 (functional, other general, and spine) and outperformed both users and ChatGPT for tumor questions. Increased word count (odds ratio = 0.89 of answering a question correctly per +10 words) and higher-order problem-solving (odds ratio = 0.40, P = .009) were associated with lower accuracy for ChatGPT, but not for GPT-4 (both P > .005). Multimodal input was not available at the time of this study; hence, on questions with image content, ChatGPT and GPT-4 answered 49.5% and 56.8% of questions correctly based on contextual context clues alone. LLMs achieved passing scores on a mock 500-question neurosurgical written board examination, with GPT-4 significantly outperforming ChatGPT.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
饱满谷波发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
FGG发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
3秒前
NN发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
中西西完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
霜降完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
不倦应助张丹兰采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
浮游应助clownnn采纳,获得10
8秒前
tommmmmm15发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
NicotineZen完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Spinnin完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
QQ颖完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
Owen应助饱满谷波采纳,获得10
12秒前
nakl发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
angel发布了新的文献求助20
13秒前
赘婿应助樱桃小丸子采纳,获得10
14秒前
星河完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
完美世界应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
沙心应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
英姑应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
华仔应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
科目三应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
浮游应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
英俊的铭应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
浮游应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
高分求助中
Pipeline and riser loss of containment 2001 - 2020 (PARLOC 2020) 1000
哈工大泛函分析教案课件、“72小时速成泛函分析:从入门到入土.PDF”等 660
Comparing natural with chemical additive production 500
The Leucovorin Guide for Parents: Understanding Autism’s Folate 500
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 500
A Manual for the Identification of Plant Seeds and Fruits : Second revised edition 500
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.) 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5215394
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4390543
关于积分的说明 13670192
捐赠科研通 4252424
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2333060
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1330703
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1284510