清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Performance of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on Neurosurgery Written Board Examinations

医学 神经外科 梅德林 医学物理学 放射科 政治学 法学
作者
Rohaid Ali,Oliver Y. Tang,Ian D. Connolly,Patricia L. Zadnik Sullivan,John H. Shin,Jared S. Fridley,Wael F. Asaad,Deus Cielo,Adetokunbo A. Oyelese,Curtis E. Doberstein,Ziya L. Gokaslan,Albert E. Telfeian
出处
期刊:Neurosurgery [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
被引量:143
标识
DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000002632
摘要

Interest surrounding generative large language models (LLMs) has rapidly grown. Although ChatGPT (GPT-3.5), a general LLM, has shown near-passing performance on medical student board examinations, the performance of ChatGPT or its successor GPT-4 on specialized examinations and the factors affecting accuracy remain unclear. This study aims to assess the performance of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on a 500-question mock neurosurgical written board examination. The Self-Assessment Neurosurgery Examinations (SANS) American Board of Neurological Surgery Self-Assessment Examination 1 was used to evaluate ChatGPT and GPT-4. Questions were in single best answer, multiple-choice format. χ 2 , Fisher exact, and univariable logistic regression tests were used to assess performance differences in relation to question characteristics. ChatGPT (GPT-3.5) and GPT-4 achieved scores of 73.4% (95% CI: 69.3%-77.2%) and 83.4% (95% CI: 79.8%-86.5%), respectively, relative to the user average of 72.8% (95% CI: 68.6%-76.6%). Both LLMs exceeded last year's passing threshold of 69%. Although scores between ChatGPT and question bank users were equivalent ( P = .963), GPT-4 outperformed both (both P < .001). GPT-4 answered every question answered correctly by ChatGPT and 37.6% (50/133) of remaining incorrect questions correctly. Among 12 question categories, GPT-4 significantly outperformed users in each but performed comparably with ChatGPT in 3 (functional, other general, and spine) and outperformed both users and ChatGPT for tumor questions. Increased word count (odds ratio = 0.89 of answering a question correctly per +10 words) and higher-order problem-solving (odds ratio = 0.40, P = .009) were associated with lower accuracy for ChatGPT, but not for GPT-4 (both P > .005). Multimodal input was not available at the time of this study; hence, on questions with image content, ChatGPT and GPT-4 answered 49.5% and 56.8% of questions correctly based on contextual context clues alone. LLMs achieved passing scores on a mock 500-question neurosurgical written board examination, with GPT-4 significantly outperforming ChatGPT.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
单纯的小土豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
彩色映雁完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
orixero应助anan采纳,获得10
19秒前
六一儿童节完成签到 ,获得积分0
27秒前
千帆破浪完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
朴素亦绿完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
hyxu678完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
刘涵完成签到 ,获得积分10
47秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
54秒前
54秒前
David发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
小不完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
健壮的迎蕾完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
zzhui完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
木南完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
火星上的芷波完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
边边角角落落完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Elytra完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
2分钟前
佳佳发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
Connie完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
雪妮完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
jjy完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
yuntong完成签到 ,获得积分0
3分钟前
zhang完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
l老王完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
lilyvan完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
米线儿完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
科研通AI5应助幸福大白采纳,获得10
3分钟前
天天快乐应助幸福大白采纳,获得10
3分钟前
脑洞疼应助幸福大白采纳,获得10
3分钟前
平常的三问完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
幸福大白发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
沙洲完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
随影相伴完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
英喆完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
点点完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
红茸茸羊完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
十七完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual, Fourth Edition 1000
INQUIRY-BASED PEDAGOGY TO SUPPORT STEM LEARNING AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS: PREPARING NEW TEACHERS TO IMPLEMENT PROJECT AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING 500
Founding Fathers The Shaping of America 500
Distinct Aggregation Behaviors and Rheological Responses of Two Terminally Functionalized Polyisoprenes with Different Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding Motifs 460
Writing to the Rhythm of Labor Cultural Politics of the Chinese Revolution, 1942–1976 300
Lightning Wires: The Telegraph and China's Technological Modernization, 1860-1890 250
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4569854
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3991737
关于积分的说明 12356238
捐赠科研通 3664215
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2019310
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1053801
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 941351