重要提醒:2025.12.15 12:00-12:50期间发布的求助,下载出现了问题,现在已经修复完毕,请重新下载即可。如非文件错误,请不要进行驳回。

Performance of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on Neurosurgery Written Board Examinations

医学 神经外科 梅德林 医学物理学 放射科 政治学 法学
作者
Rohaid Ali,Oliver Y. Tang,Ian D. Connolly,Patricia L. Zadnik Sullivan,John H. Shin,Jared S. Fridley,Wael F. Asaad,Deus Cielo,Adetokunbo A. Oyelese,Curtis E. Doberstein,Ziya L. Gokaslan,Albert E. Telfeian
出处
期刊:Neurosurgery [Oxford University Press]
被引量:143
标识
DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000002632
摘要

Interest surrounding generative large language models (LLMs) has rapidly grown. Although ChatGPT (GPT-3.5), a general LLM, has shown near-passing performance on medical student board examinations, the performance of ChatGPT or its successor GPT-4 on specialized examinations and the factors affecting accuracy remain unclear. This study aims to assess the performance of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on a 500-question mock neurosurgical written board examination. The Self-Assessment Neurosurgery Examinations (SANS) American Board of Neurological Surgery Self-Assessment Examination 1 was used to evaluate ChatGPT and GPT-4. Questions were in single best answer, multiple-choice format. χ 2 , Fisher exact, and univariable logistic regression tests were used to assess performance differences in relation to question characteristics. ChatGPT (GPT-3.5) and GPT-4 achieved scores of 73.4% (95% CI: 69.3%-77.2%) and 83.4% (95% CI: 79.8%-86.5%), respectively, relative to the user average of 72.8% (95% CI: 68.6%-76.6%). Both LLMs exceeded last year's passing threshold of 69%. Although scores between ChatGPT and question bank users were equivalent ( P = .963), GPT-4 outperformed both (both P < .001). GPT-4 answered every question answered correctly by ChatGPT and 37.6% (50/133) of remaining incorrect questions correctly. Among 12 question categories, GPT-4 significantly outperformed users in each but performed comparably with ChatGPT in 3 (functional, other general, and spine) and outperformed both users and ChatGPT for tumor questions. Increased word count (odds ratio = 0.89 of answering a question correctly per +10 words) and higher-order problem-solving (odds ratio = 0.40, P = .009) were associated with lower accuracy for ChatGPT, but not for GPT-4 (both P > .005). Multimodal input was not available at the time of this study; hence, on questions with image content, ChatGPT and GPT-4 answered 49.5% and 56.8% of questions correctly based on contextual context clues alone. LLMs achieved passing scores on a mock 500-question neurosurgical written board examination, with GPT-4 significantly outperforming ChatGPT.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
LTDJYYD完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
三只小猪完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
ding应助感动芷珍采纳,获得30
1秒前
科研通AI6应助幽默尔蓝采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
科研通AI2S应助摇摇小屋采纳,获得10
2秒前
小蘑菇应助WangY1263采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
大力翠丝完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
路路发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
三只小猪发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
后来发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
hackfeng应助李予川采纳,获得20
5秒前
酷炫星星完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
7秒前
Zane完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
wang发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
聪慧的石头完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
NexusExplorer应助呆萌的觅松采纳,获得10
10秒前
清秀的浩阑完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
晴天完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
坦率的电灯胆完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
CQJ发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1001
On the application of advanced modeling tools to the SLB analysis in NuScale. Part I: TRACE/PARCS, TRACE/PANTHER and ATHLET/DYN3D 500
L-Arginine Encapsulated Mesoporous MCM-41 Nanoparticles: A Study on In Vitro Release as Well as Kinetics 500
Haematolymphoid Tumours (Part A and Part B, WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th Edition, Volume 11) 400
Virus-like particles empower RNAi for effective control of a Coleopteran pest 400
Unraveling the Causalities of Genetic Variations - Recent Advances in Cytogenetics 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5466980
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4570650
关于积分的说明 14326629
捐赠科研通 4497178
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2463759
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1452724
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1427605