清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Performance of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on Neurosurgery Written Board Examinations

医学 神经外科 梅德林 医学物理学 放射科 政治学 法学
作者
Rohaid Ali,Oliver Y. Tang,Ian D. Connolly,Patricia L. Zadnik Sullivan,John H. Shin,Jared S. Fridley,Wael F. Asaad,Deus Cielo,Adetokunbo A. Oyelese,Curtis E. Doberstein,Ziya L. Gokaslan,Albert E. Telfeian
出处
期刊:Neurosurgery [Oxford University Press]
被引量:143
标识
DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000002632
摘要

Interest surrounding generative large language models (LLMs) has rapidly grown. Although ChatGPT (GPT-3.5), a general LLM, has shown near-passing performance on medical student board examinations, the performance of ChatGPT or its successor GPT-4 on specialized examinations and the factors affecting accuracy remain unclear. This study aims to assess the performance of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on a 500-question mock neurosurgical written board examination. The Self-Assessment Neurosurgery Examinations (SANS) American Board of Neurological Surgery Self-Assessment Examination 1 was used to evaluate ChatGPT and GPT-4. Questions were in single best answer, multiple-choice format. χ 2 , Fisher exact, and univariable logistic regression tests were used to assess performance differences in relation to question characteristics. ChatGPT (GPT-3.5) and GPT-4 achieved scores of 73.4% (95% CI: 69.3%-77.2%) and 83.4% (95% CI: 79.8%-86.5%), respectively, relative to the user average of 72.8% (95% CI: 68.6%-76.6%). Both LLMs exceeded last year's passing threshold of 69%. Although scores between ChatGPT and question bank users were equivalent ( P = .963), GPT-4 outperformed both (both P < .001). GPT-4 answered every question answered correctly by ChatGPT and 37.6% (50/133) of remaining incorrect questions correctly. Among 12 question categories, GPT-4 significantly outperformed users in each but performed comparably with ChatGPT in 3 (functional, other general, and spine) and outperformed both users and ChatGPT for tumor questions. Increased word count (odds ratio = 0.89 of answering a question correctly per +10 words) and higher-order problem-solving (odds ratio = 0.40, P = .009) were associated with lower accuracy for ChatGPT, but not for GPT-4 (both P > .005). Multimodal input was not available at the time of this study; hence, on questions with image content, ChatGPT and GPT-4 answered 49.5% and 56.8% of questions correctly based on contextual context clues alone. LLMs achieved passing scores on a mock 500-question neurosurgical written board examination, with GPT-4 significantly outperforming ChatGPT.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
8秒前
元宝麻麻发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
默默问芙完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
俊逸的盛男完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
SciGPT应助元宝麻麻采纳,获得10
36秒前
1分钟前
活力的妙之完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
zzgpku完成签到,获得积分0
1分钟前
懒得起名字完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
共享精神应助尊敬的凌晴采纳,获得10
1分钟前
sevenhill完成签到 ,获得积分0
1分钟前
浚稚完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Upupgrowth完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
年轻千愁完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Weilu完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
naki完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
HCCha完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
胡国伦完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
元宝麻麻完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
似水流年完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
今我来思完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
小蘑菇应助neptuniar采纳,获得10
3分钟前
甜美的觅荷完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
尊敬的凌晴完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
愤怒的念蕾完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
cgs完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
自由的雅旋完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
练得身形似鹤形完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
悠树里完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
gwbk完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
隐形曼青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
neptuniar发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
雪花完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Basic And Clinical Science Course 2025-2026 3000
人脑智能与人工智能 1000
花の香りの秘密―遺伝子情報から機能性まで 800
Terminologia Embryologica 500
Process Plant Design for Chemical Engineers 400
Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing, 3rd Edition 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5612005
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4696171
关于积分的说明 14890481
捐赠科研通 4730707
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2546088
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1510419
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1473299