医学
炎症性肠病
肝病学
内科学
临床试验
金标准(测试)
心理干预
随机对照试验
疾病
重症监护医学
物理疗法
精神科
作者
Nurulamin M Noor,Corey Siegel
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00240-0
摘要
Clinical trials, particularly randomised controlled trials (RCTs), have long been considered the gold-standard means to assess new interventions in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, similar to other areas of gastroenterology and hepatology, an increasing problem for trials in IBD has been the declining rates of patient participation and recruitment,1 contributing to the exponentially rising costs of conducting RCTs.2 In the same time period, there has also been an increasing appreciation of the factors (eg, intravenous, subcutaneous, or oral administration of medications) that could influence patients' preferences and decision making for treatments.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI