航空网
环境科学
辐射传输
梯度升压
随机森林
遥感
气溶胶
反照率(炼金术)
大气辐射传输码
多层感知器
气象学
人工神经网络
计算机科学
机器学习
物理
光学
地质学
艺术
表演艺术
艺术史
作者
Yehu Lu,Lunche Wang,Canming Zhu,Ling Zou,Ming Zhang,Lan Feng,Qian Cao
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2022.113105
摘要
Solar radiation is one of the cleanest sources of renewable energy, and it affects the carbon sink functions of terrestrial ecosystems. Although efforts have been made to establish solar radiation observation stations around the world, their coverage remains limited. Hence, the development of a wide variety of models and techniques is indispensable for obtaining effective solar radiation data. The aim of this study is to develop hybrid models with high computational speed and high accuracy to estimate global solar radiation (GSR) and quantify the uncertainty in GSR simulations caused by uncertainty in the measurements of atmospheric and surface parameters. The radiative transfer model (RTM) library for radiative transfer (LibRadtran) was coupled with six machine learning models: extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), multilayer perceptron (MLP), deep neural networks (DNNs), and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM). The estimated GSR was first compared to the inversion values of the GSR provided by the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) and then validated using ground-based measurements at three locations in China from 2005 to 2018. The results showed that the RTM-RF is superior in terms of computational efficiency and performance, with a mean absolute errors (MAE) and coefficients of determination (R2) of 15.57 W m−2 and 0.98, respectively. Under clear sky conditions, aerosol optical depth (AOD) contributed the most to the accuracy of GSR estimates, with an average contribution of 57.95%. The measurement uncertainty due to the asymmetry factor, AOD, single-scattering albedo, and land surface albedo (LSA) can explain the differences in GSR between RTM estimates and GSR observations at the Lulin (20.33 vs. 20.91 W m−2), Wuhan (−1.40 vs. 14.58 W m−2), and Xianghe (7.28 vs. 14.32 W m−2) sites. Our study supports the use of physical models combined with machine learning models to estimate GSR and provides valuable scientific information for large-area solar radiation estimations.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI