Survey of recurrent diagnostic challenges in breast phyllodes tumours

Background Breast phyllodes tumours (PTs) are graded as benign, borderline, or malignant by analysis of multiple histological features. PT grading is often inconsistent, likely due to variation in the weighting of grading criteria by pathologists. Design The hierarchy of use of diagnostic criteria was identified using a 20‐question survey. Results In all, 213 pathologists from 29 countries responded. 54% reported 10–50 PT cases per year. Criteria considered key to PT diagnosis were: increased stromal cellularity (84.3%), stromal overgrowth (76.6%), increased stromal mitoses (67.8%), stromal atypia (61.5%), stromal fronding (59.0%), periductal stromal condensation (58.0%), irregular tumour borders (46.3%), and/or lesional heterogeneity (33.7%). The importance of grading parameters were: mitotic activity (55.5%), stromal overgrowth (54.0%), stromal atypia (51.9%), increased stromal cellularity (41.7%), and nature of the tumour border (38.9%). 49% would diagnose malignant PT without a full array of adverse features. 89% used the term “cellular fibroepithelial lesion (FEL)” for difficult cases; 45% would diagnose an FEL with stromal fronding (but lacking other PT features) as fibroadenoma (FA), 35% FEL, and 17% PT. 59% deemed clinico‐radiological findings diagnostically significant; 68% considered age (≥40 years) important in determining if an FEL was a FA or PT. In FELs from young patients, increased stromal cellularity (83%), fronding (52%), and mitoses (41%) were more common. 34% regarded differentiating cellular FA from PT as a specific challenge; 54% had issues assigning a borderline PT grade. Conclusion Criteria for grading PT lie on a spectrum, leading to interpretive variability. The survey highlights the criteria most used by pathologists, which do not completely align with WHO recommendations.