负责任的研究和创新
感恩
欧洲联盟
透明度(行为)
宣言
质量(理念)
预测(人工智能)
自反性
工作(物理)
芯(光纤)
公共关系
政治学
会计
社会学
业务
心理学
社会心理学
计算机科学
法学
认识论
社会科学
哲学
电信
人工智能
机械工程
经济政策
工程类
作者
A. Meijer,Martijn Wiarda,Neelke Doorn,Geerten van de Kaa
标识
DOI:10.1080/09537325.2023.2225108
摘要
Responsible Innovation has recently been taken up in public policies and discourses. However, it remains challenging to institutionalise its core dimensions – inclusion, anticipation, responsiveness, reflexivity, and transparency – in practice. De jure standardisation is increasingly seen as an instrument to embed the core principles of Responsible Innovation in innovation processes, because of its anticipatory and inclusive nature. Yet, Responsible Innovation within the standardisation literature is an under-researched field of study. This paper explores and evaluates the relative importance of Responsible Innovation's core dimensions in the standards development process. We identify eighteen criteria that are deemed essential to the quality of standardisation processes. The Best-Worst Method was used to rank these criteria on their perceived importance. Diversity of participation was found to be the most important contributing factor to the quality of standardisation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI