Comparative short‐term safety and efficacy of hypnotics: A quantitative risk–benefit analysis

期限(时间) 风险分析(工程) 医学 量子力学 物理
作者
Janet M. Y. Cheung,Hannah Scott,Alexandria Muench,Ronald R. Grunstein,Andrew D. Krystal,Dieter Riemann,Michael L. Perlis
出处
期刊:Journal of Sleep Research [Wiley]
卷期号:33 (4): e14088-e14088 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1111/jsr.14088
摘要

Summary Several professional societies have provided recommendations for prescribing medications for insomnia. None has provided an integrative analysis that concurrently quantifies safety and efficacy (e.g., risk–benefit ratios). This represents an important gap for informing clinician decision‐making. Accordingly, the aim of the present review is to provide such an analysis for five classes of sleep‐promoting medications. Adverse event data values were extracted from the most recent FDA‐approved package inserts and converted to an integer before being placebo‐adjusted and standardized as a rate per 1000 (AEr). Efficacy data, pre‐to‐post self‐reported data for active and placebo conditions were acquired from pivotal trials identified in “white papers” and systematic reviews/meta‐analyses. Weighted effect sizes were calculated for subjective sleep latency, wake time after sleep onset and total sleep time, and then were averaged by medication class for each sleep continuity variable. Overall efficacy was represented by a single variable, SWT (sleep latency + wake time after sleep onset + total sleep time). Risk–benefit was represented using a simple ratio value. For safety, it was found that melatonin receptor agonists had the lowest adverse event rate (AEr = 43.1), and non‐benzodiazepine benzodiazepine receptor agonists had the highest rate (AEr = 255.0). For efficacy, it was found that the pre‐to‐post placebo adjusted effect sizes were largest for benzodiazepines (effect size = 1.94) and smallest for melatonin receptor agonists (effect size = 0.109). For risk–benefit, histamine antagonist had the most favourable profile (risk–benefit = 69.5), while melatonin receptor agonist had the least favourable profile (risk–benefit = 395.7). Overall, the combined metric for risk–benefit suggests that treatment with a histamine antagonist is optimal and potentially represents the best first‐line therapy for the medical management of insomnia.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小胖橘发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
小懒猪发布了新的文献求助20
1秒前
HmH完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
忧郁的糖豆完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
顺心聪展发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
Shirky完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
大模型应助香菜采纳,获得10
5秒前
长情咖啡豆完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
luziyun完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
斯文败类应助feng采纳,获得10
7秒前
酷波er应助Yexidong采纳,获得10
7秒前
张维娜完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
科研通AI6.1应助计蒙采纳,获得10
8秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助安安采纳,获得10
8秒前
happy发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
123完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
聪明采白完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
10秒前
六哥完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
共享精神应助高兴的风华采纳,获得10
13秒前
KYT发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
jianinghehe发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
xgwkbob发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
zzh完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
Moonpie应助香菇滑鸡饭采纳,获得30
15秒前
Moonpie应助香菇滑鸡饭采纳,获得30
15秒前
Moonpie应助香菇滑鸡饭采纳,获得30
15秒前
Moonpie应助香菇滑鸡饭采纳,获得30
15秒前
高分求助中
Malcolm Fraser : a biography 680
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
天津市智库成果选编 600
Climate change and sports: Statistics report on climate change and sports 500
Forced degradation and stability indicating LC method for Letrozole: A stress testing guide 500
全相对论原子结构与含时波包动力学的理论研究--清华大学 500
Organic Reactions Volume 118 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6455729
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8266266
关于积分的说明 17618484
捐赠科研通 5521980
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2904983
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1881718
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1724833