Comparative short‐term safety and efficacy of hypnotics: A quantitative risk–benefit analysis

期限(时间) 风险分析(工程) 医学 量子力学 物理
作者
Janet M. Y. Cheung,Hannah Scott,Alexandria Muench,Ronald R. Grunstein,Andrew D. Krystal,Dieter Riemann,Michael L. Perlis
出处
期刊:Journal of Sleep Research [Wiley]
卷期号:33 (4): e14088-e14088 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1111/jsr.14088
摘要

Summary Several professional societies have provided recommendations for prescribing medications for insomnia. None has provided an integrative analysis that concurrently quantifies safety and efficacy (e.g., risk–benefit ratios). This represents an important gap for informing clinician decision‐making. Accordingly, the aim of the present review is to provide such an analysis for five classes of sleep‐promoting medications. Adverse event data values were extracted from the most recent FDA‐approved package inserts and converted to an integer before being placebo‐adjusted and standardized as a rate per 1000 (AEr). Efficacy data, pre‐to‐post self‐reported data for active and placebo conditions were acquired from pivotal trials identified in “white papers” and systematic reviews/meta‐analyses. Weighted effect sizes were calculated for subjective sleep latency, wake time after sleep onset and total sleep time, and then were averaged by medication class for each sleep continuity variable. Overall efficacy was represented by a single variable, SWT (sleep latency + wake time after sleep onset + total sleep time). Risk–benefit was represented using a simple ratio value. For safety, it was found that melatonin receptor agonists had the lowest adverse event rate (AEr = 43.1), and non‐benzodiazepine benzodiazepine receptor agonists had the highest rate (AEr = 255.0). For efficacy, it was found that the pre‐to‐post placebo adjusted effect sizes were largest for benzodiazepines (effect size = 1.94) and smallest for melatonin receptor agonists (effect size = 0.109). For risk–benefit, histamine antagonist had the most favourable profile (risk–benefit = 69.5), while melatonin receptor agonist had the least favourable profile (risk–benefit = 395.7). Overall, the combined metric for risk–benefit suggests that treatment with a histamine antagonist is optimal and potentially represents the best first‐line therapy for the medical management of insomnia.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
清爽慕山完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
无奈安双完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
冷静火龙果完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
等待黎明完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
wjw完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
康轲完成签到,获得积分0
1秒前
勤奋的秋烟完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
清爽慕山发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
静xixi发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
heng完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
芋头读文献完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
大方芷文完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
秦时明月完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
球球发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
再见了星空完成签到,获得积分0
7秒前
醉熏的伊完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Ho完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
文静的翠彤完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
无极微光应助静xixi采纳,获得20
9秒前
XF完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
华仔应助WY采纳,获得10
12秒前
自信的汉堡完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
橘子完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
16秒前
16秒前
林北bei完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
和谐的醉山完成签到,获得积分0
17秒前
Alfred完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
优美的莹芝完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
光亮向真完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
xmn完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
彪壮的冰双完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
adobe完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
小绵羊完成签到,获得积分20
22秒前
orixero应助Yanz采纳,获得10
22秒前
健康的惊蛰完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
高分求助中
Malcolm Fraser : a biography 680
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
天津市智库成果选编 600
Climate change and sports: Statistics report on climate change and sports 500
Forced degradation and stability indicating LC method for Letrozole: A stress testing guide 500
Organic Reactions Volume 118 400
A Foreign Missionary on the Long March: The Unpublished Memoirs of Arnolis Hayman of the China Inland Mission 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6459307
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8268426
关于积分的说明 17621881
捐赠科研通 5528528
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2905911
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1882638
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1727808