亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Racial Differences in Shared Decision-Making About Critical Illness

医学 危重病 梅德林 重症监护医学 病危 政治学 法学
作者
Deepshikha Charan Ashana,Whitney Welsh,Doreet Preiss,Jessica Sperling,HyunBin You,Karissa Tu,Shannon S. Carson,Catherine L. Hough,Douglas B. White,Meeta Prasad Kerlin,Sharron L. Docherty,Kimberly S. Johnson,Christopher E. Cox
出处
期刊:JAMA Internal Medicine [American Medical Association]
卷期号:184 (4): 424-424 被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.8433
摘要

Importance Shared decision-making is the preferred method for evaluating complex tradeoffs in the care of patients with critical illness. However, it remains unknown whether critical care clinicians engage diverse patients and caregivers equitably in shared decision-making. Objective To compare critical care clinicians' approaches to shared decision-making in recorded conversations with Black and White caregivers of patients with critical illness. Design, Setting, and Participants This thematic analysis consisted of unstructured clinician-caregiver meetings audio-recorded during a randomized clinical trial of a decision aid about prolonged mechanical ventilation at 13 intensive care units in the US. Participants in meetings included critical care clinicians and Black or White caregivers of patients who underwent mechanical ventilation. The codebook included components of shared decision-making and known mechanisms of racial disparities in clinical communication. Analysts were blinded to caregiver race during coding. Patterns within and across racial groups were evaluated to identify themes. Data analysis was conducted between August 2021 and April 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were themes describing clinician behaviors varying by self-reported race of the caregivers. Results The overall sample comprised 20 Black and 19 White caregivers for a total of 39 audio-recorded meetings with clinicians. The duration of meetings was similar for both Black and White caregivers (mean [SD], 23.9 [13.7] minutes vs 22.1 [11.2] minutes, respectively). Both Black and White caregivers were generally middle-aged (mean [SD] age, 47.6 [9.9] years vs 51.9 [8.8] years, respectively), female (15 [75.0%] vs 14 [73.7%], respectively), and possessed a high level of self-assessed health literacy, which was scored from 3 to 15 with lower scores indicating increasing health literacy (mean [SD], 5.8 [2.3] vs 5.3 [2.0], respectively). Clinicians conducting meetings with Black and White caregivers were generally young (mean [SD] age, 38.8 [6.6] years vs 37.9 [8.2] years, respectively), male (13 [72.2%] vs 12 [70.6%], respectively), and White (14 [77.8%] vs 17 [100%], respectively). Four variations in clinicians' shared decision-making behaviors by caregiver race were identified: (1) providing limited emotional support for Black caregivers, (2) failing to acknowledge trust and gratitude expressed by Black caregivers, (3) sharing limited medical information with Black caregivers, and (4) challenging Black caregivers' preferences for restorative care. These themes encompass both relational and informational aspects of shared decision-making. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this thematic analysis showed that critical care clinicians missed opportunities to acknowledge emotions and value the knowledge of Black caregivers compared with White caregivers. These findings may inform future clinician-level interventions aimed at promoting equitable shared decision-making.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
牧析山完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
7秒前
15秒前
endmarki完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
微笑外套发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
23秒前
Yoanna_UTHSC应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
Yoanna_UTHSC应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
29秒前
He发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
科研通AI2S应助冷静新烟采纳,获得10
44秒前
48秒前
50秒前
52秒前
1分钟前
1分钟前
大知闲闲完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
范范发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
畅快的篮球完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
科目三应助范范采纳,获得10
1分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
Yoanna_UTHSC应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
hggyt发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
王淳完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
清脆遥完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
liuyuan完成签到,获得积分20
3分钟前
3分钟前
zqq完成签到,获得积分0
3分钟前
3分钟前
无辜的傲安完成签到,获得积分20
3分钟前
高分求助中
Solution Manual for Strategic Compensation A Human Resource Management Approach 1200
Natural History of Mantodea 螳螂的自然史 1000
Glucuronolactone Market Outlook Report: Industry Size, Competition, Trends and Growth Opportunities by Region, YoY Forecasts from 2024 to 2031 800
A Photographic Guide to Mantis of China 常见螳螂野外识别手册 800
Zeitschrift für Orient-Archäologie 500
Smith-Purcell Radiation 500
Autoregulatory progressive resistance exercise: linear versus a velocity-based flexible model 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 细胞生物学 免疫学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3341779
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2969199
关于积分的说明 8637576
捐赠科研通 2648889
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1450383
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 671902
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 660966