医学
复苏
感染性休克
重症监护医学
败血症
静脉输液
机械通风
休克(循环)
麻醉
加药
内科学
外科
作者
Dipayan Chaudhuri,Brent Herritt,Kimberley Lewis,José L. Díaz‐Gómez,Alison Fox‐Robichaud,Ian Ball,John Granton,Bram Rochwerg
出处
期刊:Chest
[Elsevier]
日期:2020-10-13
卷期号:159 (4): 1493-1502
被引量:17
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2020.09.269
摘要
Early IV fluid administration remains one of the modern pillars of sepsis treatment; however, questions regarding amount, type, rate, mechanism of action, and even the benefits of fluid remain unanswered. Administering the optimal fluid volume is important, because overzealous fluid resuscitation can precipitate multiorgan failure, prolong mechanical ventilation, and worsen patient outcomes. After the initial resuscitation, further fluid administration should be determined by individual patient factors and measures of fluid responsiveness. This review describes various static and dynamic measures that are used to assess fluid responsiveness and summarizes the evidence addressing these metrics. Subsequently, we outline a practical approach to the evaluation of fluid responsiveness in early septic shock and explore further areas crucial to ongoing research examining this topic.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI